Re: [PATCH v2 20/21] dt-bindings: display/msm/gmu: Add Adreno X2-85 GMU

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 13/11/2025 09:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/11/2025 15:25, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> On 11/11/2025 1:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:07:26PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>> Document Adreno X2-85 GMU found in Glymur chipsets in the
>>>> dt-binding specification. It is very similar to Adreno 840
>>>> GMU with the additional requirement of RSCC HUB clock.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> <form letter>
>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>
>>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>>
>>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>>> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
>>> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
>>> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
>>> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
>>> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
>>> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> Please read:
>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>> </form letter>
>>>
>>
>> I think you got confused. These are new patches I have included for
>> Glymur support in Rev 2 (as mentioned in the cover letter). Did you
>> confuse with the other patch for Kaanapali?
> 
> I did check in the changelog and there is nothing about new bindings
> patch, so you expect me to keep guessing what is happening here.
> 
> Squash this with previous patch then. It's really churn to deal with one
> single liner per patch and commit msg has absoutely ZERO content to be
> useful on its own.

I meant, squash the second patch with one liner. This one is fine.

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof