From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>
To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>, "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Cc: <linux-imx@nxp.com>, <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
<openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>, Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@linux.dev>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@google.com>,
Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@quicinc.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Christophe Branchereau <cbranchereau@gmail.com>,
Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Nancy Yuen <yuenn@google.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@gmail.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@gmail.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 32/34] iio: adc: stm32-adc: convert to device properties
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 17:58:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a292a46-71d0-a078-f92f-158deb58a764@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220611164745.3e99b730@jic23-huawei>
On 6/11/22 17:47, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:45:43 +0200
> Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com> wrote:
>
>> Make the conversion to firmware agnostic device properties. As part of
>> the conversion the IIO inkern interface 'of_xlate()' is also converted to
>> 'fwnode_xlate()'. The goal is to completely drop 'of_xlate' and hence OF
>> dependencies from IIO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
>
> One trivial comment inline.
>
> In general this particular refactor is complex, so I either want
> eyes of those familiar with the driver and / or testing or we may want
> to reduce the scope to just the fwnode_xlate() and leave the more
> complex conversions for when we can get that testing done.
>
> Let's see if we get the necessary review on this more complex patch.
> I just don't want us to get stalled by trying to do too much at once!
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>> index a68ecbda6480..87acef31ace1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>> @@ -21,11 +21,11 @@
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>> #include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> -#include <linux/of.h>
>> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/property.h>
>>
>> #include "stm32-adc-core.h"
>>
>> @@ -1524,8 +1524,8 @@ static int stm32_adc_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int stm32_adc_of_xlate(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> - const struct of_phandle_args *iiospec)
>> +static int stm32_adc_fwnode_xlate(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> + const struct fwnode_reference_args *iiospec)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> @@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ static const struct iio_info stm32_adc_iio_info = {
>> .hwfifo_set_watermark = stm32_adc_set_watermark,
>> .update_scan_mode = stm32_adc_update_scan_mode,
>> .debugfs_reg_access = stm32_adc_debugfs_reg_access,
>> - .of_xlate = stm32_adc_of_xlate,
>> + .fwnode_xlate = stm32_adc_fwnode_xlate,
>> };
>>
>> static unsigned int stm32_adc_dma_residue(struct stm32_adc *adc)
>> @@ -1776,14 +1776,14 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec_ext_info stm32_adc_ext_info[] = {
>> {},
>> };
>>
>> -static int stm32_adc_of_get_resolution(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>> +static int stm32_adc_fw_get_resolution(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *node = indio_dev->dev.of_node;
>> + struct device *dev = &indio_dev->dev;
>> struct stm32_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> unsigned int i;
>> u32 res;
>>
>> - if (of_property_read_u32(node, "assigned-resolution-bits", &res))
>> + if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "assigned-resolution-bits", &res))
>> res = adc->cfg->adc_info->resolutions[0];
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < adc->cfg->adc_info->num_res; i++)
>> @@ -1867,11 +1867,11 @@ static void stm32_adc_chan_init_one(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>
>> static int stm32_adc_get_legacy_chan_count(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct stm32_adc *adc)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *node = indio_dev->dev.of_node;
>> + struct device *dev = &indio_dev->dev;
>> const struct stm32_adc_info *adc_info = adc->cfg->adc_info;
>> int num_channels = 0, ret;
>>
>> - ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "st,adc-channels");
>> + ret = device_property_count_u32(dev, "st,adc-channels");
>> if (ret > adc_info->max_channels) {
>> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Bad st,adc-channels?\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -1879,18 +1879,17 @@ static int stm32_adc_get_legacy_chan_count(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct stm
>> num_channels += ret;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, "st,adc-diff-channels",
>> - sizeof(struct stm32_adc_diff_channel));
>> - if (ret > adc_info->max_channels) {
>> + ret = device_property_count_u32(dev, "st,adc-diff-channels");
>> + if ((ret / 2) > adc_info->max_channels) {
> hmm. The magic '2' that is introduced here kind of looses some of the meaning
> that existed for the *_count_elems_of_size()
>
> Perhaps introduce a define or a comment on why it is 2?
Hi Nuno,
Thanks for your patch, please find some remarks below.
First, I agree with Jonathan here. (Just suggesting) Would it be
possible to keep a reference to the target struct to ease long term
maintenance ? I'm thinking of:
sizeof(struct stm32_adc_diff_channel) / sizeof(u32).
Or possibly a better approach...
>
>> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Bad st,adc-diff-channels?\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> - } else if (ret > 0) {
>> - adc->num_diff = ret;
>> - num_channels += ret;
>> + } else if ((ret / 2) > 0) {
>> + adc->num_diff = ret / 2;
>> + num_channels += ret / 2;
>> }
>>
>> /* Optional sample time is provided either for each, or all channels */
>> - ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "st,min-sample-time-nsecs");
>> + ret = device_property_count_u32(dev, "st,min-sample-time-nsecs");
>> if (ret > 1 && ret != num_channels) {
>> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid st,min-sample-time-nsecs\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -1901,21 +1900,20 @@ static int stm32_adc_get_legacy_chan_count(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct stm
>>
>> static int stm32_adc_legacy_chan_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> struct stm32_adc *adc,
>> - struct iio_chan_spec *channels)
>> + struct iio_chan_spec *channels,
>> + int nchans)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *node = indio_dev->dev.of_node;
>> const struct stm32_adc_info *adc_info = adc->cfg->adc_info;
>> struct stm32_adc_diff_channel diff[STM32_ADC_CH_MAX];
>> + struct device *dev = &indio_dev->dev;
>> u32 num_diff = adc->num_diff;
>> int size = num_diff * sizeof(*diff) / sizeof(u32);
>> - int scan_index = 0, val, ret, i;
>> - struct property *prop;
>> - const __be32 *cur;
>> - u32 smp = 0;
>> + int scan_index = 0, ret, i;
>> + u32 smp = 0, nsmps, smps[STM32_ADC_CH_MAX], chans[STM32_ADC_CH_MAX];
>>
>> if (num_diff) {
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, "st,adc-diff-channels",
>> - (u32 *)diff, size);
>> + ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, "st,adc-diff-channels",
>> + (u32 *)diff, size);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Failed to get diff channels %d\n", ret);
>> return ret;
>> @@ -1936,32 +1934,51 @@ static int stm32_adc_legacy_chan_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - of_property_for_each_u32(node, "st,adc-channels", prop, cur, val) {
>> - if (val >= adc_info->max_channels) {
>> - dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid channel %d\n", val);
>> + ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, "st,adc-channels", chans,
>> + nchans);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nchans; i++) {
Shouldn't use 'i' variable as is.
I tested at my end. There's a bug around here, as the same variable 'i'
is used already in next for loop. It creates an endless loop, that ends
up in incrementing scan_index indefinitely until some oops occurs.
I fixed that locally for quick testing by using another variable.
Isn't there a helper to achive this (e.g. like of_property_for_each_u32) ?
>> + if (chans[i] >= adc_info->max_channels) {
>> + dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid channel %d\n",
>> + chans[i]);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> /* Channel can't be configured both as single-ended & diff */
>> for (i = 0; i < num_diff; i++) {
>> - if (val == diff[i].vinp) {
>> - dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "channel %d misconfigured\n", val);
>> + if (chans[i] == diff[i].vinp) {
>> + dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "channel %d misconfigured\n", chans[i]);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> }
>> - stm32_adc_chan_init_one(indio_dev, &channels[scan_index], val,
>> - 0, scan_index, false);
>> + stm32_adc_chan_init_one(indio_dev, &channels[scan_index],
>> + chans[i], 0, scan_index, false);
>> scan_index++;
>> }
>>
>> + nsmps = device_property_count_u32(dev, "st,min-sample-time-nsecs");
>> + if (nsmps) {
>> + if (nsmps >= nchans)
nit: if (nsmps > nchans)
>> + nsmps = nchans;
There's a bit of redundancy in checking nsmps,
"st,min-sample-time-nsecs" is already sanitized in
stm32_adc_get_legacy_chan_count():
/* Optional sample time is provided either for each, or all channels */
ret = device_property_count_u32(dev, "st,min-sample-time-nsecs");
if (ret > 1 && ret != num_channels) {
dev_err(...
So just sharing my thoughts here:
- Maybe this could be dropped ?
(Thinking loudly) The earliest this gets sanitized, the less un-needed
initialisations happen before failing?
- Or the earlier check could be moved here ?
I've no strong opinion.
>> +
>> + ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, "st,min-sample-time-nsecs",
>> + smps, nsmps);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < scan_index; i++) {
>> /*
>> - * Using of_property_read_u32_index(), smp value will only be
>> - * modified if valid u32 value can be decoded. This allows to
>> - * get either no value, 1 shared value for all indexes, or one
>> - * value per channel.
>> + * This check is used with the above logic so that smp value
>> + * will only be modified if valid u32 value can be decoded. This
>> + * allows to get either no value, 1 shared value for all indexes,
>> + * or one value per channel. The point is to have the same
>> + * behavior as 'of_property_read_u32_index()'.
>> */
>> - of_property_read_u32_index(node, "st,min-sample-time-nsecs", i, &smp);
>> + if (i < nsmps)
>> + smp = smps[i];
Minor remark, I'm wondering if using a switch (nsmps) {.. case} or
similar would help to improve understandabilty / readability ?
Best Regards,
Fabrice
>>
>> /* Prepare sampling time settings */
>> stm32_adc_smpr_init(adc, channels[i].channel, smp);
>> @@ -2004,22 +2021,21 @@ static int stm32_adc_generic_chan_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> struct stm32_adc *adc,
>> struct iio_chan_spec *channels)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *node = indio_dev->dev.of_node;
>> const struct stm32_adc_info *adc_info = adc->cfg->adc_info;
>> - struct device_node *child;
>> + struct fwnode_handle *child;
>> const char *name;
>> int val, scan_index = 0, ret;
>> bool differential;
>> u32 vin[2];
>>
>> - for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child) {
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &val);
>> + device_for_each_child_node(&indio_dev->dev, child) {
>> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &val);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Missing channel index %d\n", ret);
>> goto err;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = of_property_read_string(child, "label", &name);
>> + ret = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &name);
>> /* label is optional */
>> if (!ret) {
>> if (strlen(name) >= STM32_ADC_CH_SZ) {
>> @@ -2044,7 +2060,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_generic_chan_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> }
>>
>> differential = false;
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(child, "diff-channels", vin, 2);
>> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child, "diff-channels", vin, 2);
>> /* diff-channels is optional */
>> if (!ret) {
>> differential = true;
>> @@ -2061,7 +2077,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_generic_chan_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> stm32_adc_chan_init_one(indio_dev, &channels[scan_index], val,
>> vin[1], scan_index, differential);
>>
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "st,min-sample-time-ns", &val);
>> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "st,min-sample-time-ns", &val);
>> /* st,min-sample-time-ns is optional */
>> if (!ret) {
>> stm32_adc_smpr_init(adc, channels[scan_index].channel, val);
>> @@ -2079,14 +2095,13 @@ static int stm32_adc_generic_chan_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> return scan_index;
>>
>> err:
>> - of_node_put(child);
>> + fwnode_handle_put(child);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool timestamping)
>> +static int stm32_adc_chan_fw_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool timestamping)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *node = indio_dev->dev.of_node;
>> struct stm32_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> const struct stm32_adc_info *adc_info = adc->cfg->adc_info;
>> struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
>> @@ -2096,7 +2111,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool timestamping)
>> for (i = 0; i < STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB; i++)
>> adc->int_ch[i] = STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NONE;
>>
>> - num_channels = of_get_available_child_count(node);
>> + num_channels = device_get_child_node_count(&indio_dev->dev);
>> /* If no channels have been found, fallback to channels legacy properties. */
>> if (!num_channels) {
>> legacy = true;
>> @@ -2127,7 +2142,8 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool timestamping)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> if (legacy)
>> - ret = stm32_adc_legacy_chan_init(indio_dev, adc, channels);
>> + ret = stm32_adc_legacy_chan_init(indio_dev, adc, channels,
>> + num_channels);
>> else
>> ret = stm32_adc_generic_chan_init(indio_dev, adc, channels);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> @@ -2209,9 +2225,6 @@ static int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> bool timestamping = false;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> -
>> indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*adc));
>> if (!indio_dev)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -2220,17 +2233,16 @@ static int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> adc->common = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>> spin_lock_init(&adc->lock);
>> init_completion(&adc->completion);
>> - adc->cfg = (const struct stm32_adc_cfg *)
>> - of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, dev)->data;
>> + adc->cfg = device_get_match_data(dev);
>>
>> indio_dev->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
>> - indio_dev->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + device_set_node(&indio_dev->dev, dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev));
>> indio_dev->info = &stm32_adc_iio_info;
>> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE | INDIO_HARDWARE_TRIGGERED;
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
>>
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg", &adc->offset);
>> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "reg", &adc->offset);
>> if (ret != 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing reg property\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -2259,7 +2271,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - ret = stm32_adc_of_get_resolution(indio_dev);
>> + ret = stm32_adc_fw_get_resolution(indio_dev);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> @@ -2276,7 +2288,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> timestamping = true;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = stm32_adc_chan_of_init(indio_dev, timestamping);
>> + ret = stm32_adc_chan_fw_init(indio_dev, timestamping);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto err_dma_disable;
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-17 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 8:45 [PATCH 00/34] make iio inkern interface firmware agnostic Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 01/34] iio: adc: ad7606: explicitly add proper header files Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 13:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 02/34] iio: adc: ad7606_par: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 03/34] iio: adc: berlin2-adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 04/34] iio: adc: imx7d_adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 05/34] iio: adc: imx8qxp-adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 06/34] iio: adc: ingenic-adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 14:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-10 19:49 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 07/34] iio: adc: mp2629_adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 08/34] iio: adc: mt6360-adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 09/34] iio: adc: npcm_adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 10/34] iio: adc: rzg2l_adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 11/34] iio: common: cros_ec_lid_angle: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 12/34] iio: common: cros_ec_sensors: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 13/34] iio: dac: stm32-dac: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 14/34] iio: dac: vf610_dac: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 15/34] iio: humidity: hts221_buffer: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 14:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-11 14:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 16/34] iio: light: cros_ec_light_prox: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 17/34] iio: pressure: cros_ec_baro: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 18/34] iio: trigger: stm32-lptimer-trigger: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 19/34] iio: core: drop of.h from iio.h Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 20/34] iio: inkern: only relase the device node when done with it Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 14:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-10 20:08 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 14:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-13 7:20 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-18 17:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 21/34] iio: inkern: fix return value in devm_of_iio_channel_get_by_name() Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 14:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 22/34] iio: inkern: only return error codes in iio_channel_get_*() APIs Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 15:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-10 19:48 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 15:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-13 7:06 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-18 14:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 23/34] iio: inkern: split of_iio_channel_get_by_name() Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 15:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 24/34] iio: inkern: move to fwnode properties Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 15:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-10 20:01 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 15:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 25/34] thermal: qcom: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5: convert to IIO fwnode API Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 15:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-10 19:42 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 26/34] iio: adc: ingenic-adc: convert to IIO fwnode interface Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 27/34] iio: adc: ab8500-gpadc: convert to device properties Nuno Sá
2022-06-15 14:26 ` Linus Walleij
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 28/34] iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 29/34] iio: adc: qcom-pm8xxx-xoadc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-15 14:27 ` Linus Walleij
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 30/34] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-vadc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-16 13:15 ` Linus Walleij
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 31/34] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-adc5: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-16 13:16 ` Linus Walleij
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 32/34] iio: adc: stm32-adc: " Nuno Sá
2022-06-11 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-17 15:58 ` Fabrice Gasnier [this message]
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 33/34] iio: inkern: remove OF dependencies Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 34/34] iio: inkern: fix coding style warnings Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 15:53 ` Joe Simmons-Talbott
2022-06-10 19:51 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-12 17:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-13 7:23 ` Nuno Sá
2022-06-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 00/34] make iio inkern interface firmware agnostic Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-10 15:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a292a46-71d0-a078-f92f-158deb58a764@foss.st.com \
--to=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=amitk@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=avifishman70@gmail.com \
--cc=benjaminfair@google.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=cai.huoqing@linux.dev \
--cc=cbranchereau@gmail.com \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=eugen.hristev@microchip.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=quic_jprakash@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sravanhome@gmail.com \
--cc=tali.perry1@gmail.com \
--cc=thara.gopinath@linaro.org \
--cc=tmaimon77@gmail.com \
--cc=venture@google.com \
--cc=yuenn@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).