From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, anup@brainfault.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
yilun.xu@intel.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
jarkko@kernel.org, amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
mic@digikod.net, vannapurve@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, david@redhat.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:21:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a2f8aaa-1664-48ee-8fb0-3fa80e2e8a23@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EHjTxOmSQA90joVqR90cJ_eTrdvNfmAgtUmopP_ZdcaCPcjQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/17/25 11:12, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> Hi Vlastimil,
>
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 at 09:49, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/11/25 13:11, Fuad Tabba wrote:
>> > Before transitioning a guest_memfd folio to unshared, thereby
>> > disallowing access by the host and allowing the hypervisor to
>> > transition its view of the guest page as private, we need to be
>> > sure that the host doesn't have any references to the folio.
>> >
>> > This patch introduces a new type for guest_memfd folios, which
>> > isn't activated in this series but is here as a placeholder and
>> > to facilitate the code in the next patch. This will be used in
>>
>> It's not clear to me how the code in the next page is facilitated as it
>> doesn't use any of this?
>
> I'm sorry about that, I'm missing the word "series". i.e.,
>
>> > This patch introduces a new type for guest_memfd folios, which
>> > isn't activated in this series but is here as a placeholder and
>> > to facilitate the code in the next patch *series*.
>
> I'm referring to this series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250117163001.2326672-1-tabba@google.com/
>
>> > the future to register a callback that informs the guest_memfd
>> > subsystem when the last reference is dropped, therefore knowing
>> > that the host doesn't have any remaining references.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
>> > ---
>> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 9 +++++++++
>> > include/linux/page-flags.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> > mm/debug.c | 1 +
>> > mm/swap.c | 9 +++++++++
>> > virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 7 +++++++
>> > 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> > index f34f4cfaa513..8b5f28f6efff 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> > @@ -2571,4 +2571,13 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> > struct kvm_pre_fault_memory *range);
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
>> > +void kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(struct folio *folio);
>> > +#else
>> > +static inline void kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(struct folio *folio)
>> > +{
>> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> > +}
>>
>> Since the caller is guarded by CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM, do we need the
>> CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM=n variant at all?
>
> No. I'll remove it.
>
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > #endif
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> > index 6dc2494bd002..734afda268ab 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> > @@ -933,6 +933,17 @@ enum pagetype {
>> > PGTY_slab = 0xf5,
>> > PGTY_zsmalloc = 0xf6,
>> > PGTY_unaccepted = 0xf7,
>> > + /*
>> > + * guestmem folios are used to back VM memory as managed by guest_memfd.
>> > + * Once the last reference is put, instead of freeing these folios back
>> > + * to the page allocator, they are returned to guest_memfd.
>> > + *
>> > + * For now, guestmem will only be set on these folios as long as they
>> > + * cannot be mapped to user space ("private state"), with the plan of
>>
>> Might be a bit misleading as I don't think it's set yet as of this series.
>> But I guess we can keep it to avoid another update later.
>
> You're right, it's not in this series. But as you said, the idea is to
> have the least amount of churn in the core mm code.
>
>> > + * always setting that type once typed folios can be mapped to user
>> > + * space cleanly.
>> > + */
>> > + PGTY_guestmem = 0xf8,
>> >
>> > PGTY_mapcount_underflow = 0xff
>> > };
>> > @@ -1082,6 +1093,12 @@ FOLIO_TYPE_OPS(hugetlb, hugetlb)
>> > FOLIO_TEST_FLAG_FALSE(hugetlb)
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
>> > +FOLIO_TYPE_OPS(guestmem, guestmem)
>> > +#else
>> > +FOLIO_TEST_FLAG_FALSE(guestmem)
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > PAGE_TYPE_OPS(Zsmalloc, zsmalloc, zsmalloc)
>> >
>> > /*
>> > diff --git a/mm/debug.c b/mm/debug.c
>> > index 8d2acf432385..08bc42c6cba8 100644
>> > --- a/mm/debug.c
>> > +++ b/mm/debug.c
>> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const char *page_type_names[] = {
>> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(table),
>> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(buddy),
>> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(unaccepted),
>> > + DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(guestmem),
>> > };
>> >
>> > static const char *page_type_name(unsigned int page_type)
>> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
>> > index 47bc1bb919cc..241880a46358 100644
>> > --- a/mm/swap.c
>> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
>> > @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
>> > #include <linux/local_lock.h>
>> > #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
>> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> > +#endif
>>
>> Do we need to guard the include?
>
> Yes, otherwise allnoconfig complains due to many of the x86 things it
> drags along if included but KVM isn't configured. I could put it in a
> different header that doesn't have this problem, but I couldn't think
> of a better header for this.
Ok, you can add
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 12:11 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2025-02-17 9:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-20 11:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-02-12 18:19 ` Peter Xu
2025-02-13 8:29 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-17 9:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-17 10:12 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-17 11:21 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-02-17 11:21 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-20 11:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-20 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:38 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-20 11:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-02-12 5:07 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-12 9:21 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-12 21:23 ` Peter Xu
2025-02-13 8:24 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Add KVM capability to check if guest_memfd is shared Fuad Tabba
2025-02-20 11:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle in-place shared memory as guest_memfd backed memory Fuad Tabba
2025-02-12 0:15 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-12 9:23 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: x86: Mark KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM as supporting guest_memfd shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 15:57 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 16:13 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 16:25 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 16:34 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 16:57 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 17:04 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 17:19 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_SW_PROTECTED machine type Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 16:12 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 16:17 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 16:29 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 16:32 ` Patrick Roy
2025-02-11 17:09 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-14 11:13 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-14 11:33 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-14 12:37 ` Patrick Roy
2025-02-14 13:11 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-14 13:18 ` Patrick Roy
2025-02-14 15:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a2f8aaa-1664-48ee-8fb0-3fa80e2e8a23@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox