Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Convert kpss-acc driver Documentation to yaml

[Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 01:12:37PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/06/2022 12:40, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 08:14:12AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 28/06/2022 20:41, Christian Marangi wrote:
> >>> Convert kpss-acc driver Documentation to yaml.
> >>> The original Documentation was wrong all along. Fix it while we are
> >>> converting it.
> >>> The example was wrong as kpss-acc-v2 should only expose the regs but we
> >>> don't have any driver that expose additional clocks. The kpss-acc driver
> >>> is only specific to v1. For this exact reason, limit all the additional
> >>> bindings (clocks, clock-names, clock-output-names and #clock-cells) to
> >>> v1 and also flag that these bindings should NOT be used for v2.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> This is still not fixed and not tested. Since 4 versions of this
> >> patchset (previously was part of other set).
> >>
> >> I retract my review. Please test the bindings.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> > 
> > Thing is that I tested them and on my side I don't have such errors.
> 
> Then maybe update your dtschema because I can easily see them.
>

You are totally right. I didn't had the problem as I was updating the
dtschema with sudo pip3... and it wasn't updating the dtschema local to
the linux repo. Didn't know that and I could't understand why I didn't
had the error.

> > 
> > I'm using the linux-next branch. Should I use something else that have
> > newer schema files?
> > 
> > Also on other patch there are some error reported that are unrelated to
> > my change and that looks strange.
> 
> The other might be not be relevant, but this one is real and reproducible.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
	Ansuel