From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, <agross@kernel.org>,
<andersson@kernel.org>, <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>, <quic_gokulsri@quicinc.com>,
<quic_sjaganat@quicinc.com>, <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>,
<quic_arajkuma@quicinc.com>, <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>,
<quic_poovendh@quicinc.com>, <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] regulator: qcom_smd: Add support to define the bootup voltage
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 14:58:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bb22160-5966-43d3-ffba-489b77b3a095@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc037133-7c45-325f-4a1d-9855d033ae5c@linaro.org>
On 1/27/2023 9:40 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 27.01.2023 17:07, Devi Priya wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/13/2023 9:07 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13.01.2023 16:03, devi priya wrote:
>>>> Kernel does not know the initial voltage set by the bootloaders.
>>>> During regulator registration, the voltage variable is just declared
>>>> and it is zero. Based on that, the regulator framework considers current
>>>> the voltage as zero and tries to bring up each regulator to minimum
>>>> the supported voltage.
>>>>
>>>> This introduces a dip in the voltage during kernel boot and gets
>>>> stabilized once the voltage scaling comes into picture.
>>>>
>>>> To avoid the voltage dip, adding support to define the
>>>> bootup voltage set by the boodloaders and based on it, regulator
>>>> framework understands that proper voltage is already set
>>>>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>> Or maybe hook it up to the spmi_regulator_common_get_voltage()
>>> from the SPMI regulator driver and read the real voltage instead
>>> of relying on hardcoded values thay may differ between boards?
>>>
>>> Konrad
>> In IPQ9574, SPMI regulator is not used. We are using RPM-Glink communication and the regulators are controlled by RPM.
>> In this case, we don't have an option to readback the bootup voltage and so, we have hardcoded the values
> Unless something changed, RPM regulator framework is simply a
> fancy front-end for communicating with the PMIC over SPMI, AFAIK..
>
> Konrad
Currently in our driver, the voltage write request will be sent to RPM
via GLINK which then writes it to the PMIC over I2C using the below APIs
qcom_rpm_smd_write -> rpmsg_send
In IPQ9574, we do not have SPMI support or the support to readback voltage.
>>
>>>> drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c | 6 +++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>>>> index 1eb17d378897..49a36b07397c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>>>> @@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ struct rpm_regulator_data {
>>>> u32 id;
>>>> const struct regulator_desc *desc;
>>>> const char *supply;
>>>> + int boot_uV; /* To store the bootup voltage set by bootloaders */
>>>> };
>>>> static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_mp5496_regulators[] = {
>>>> @@ -809,7 +810,7 @@ static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_mp5496_regulators[] = {
>>>> };
>>>> static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_ipq9574_mp5496_regulators[] = {
>>>> - { "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &ipq9574_mp5496_smpa1, "s1" },
>>>> + { "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &ipq9574_mp5496_smpa1, "s1", 875000 },
>>>> {}
>>>> };
>>>> @@ -1394,6 +1395,9 @@ static int rpm_regulator_init_vreg(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg, struct device *dev
>>>> vreg->type = rpm_data->type;
>>>> vreg->id = rpm_data->id;
>>>> + if (rpm_data->boot_uV)
>>>> + vreg->uV = rpm_data->boot_uV;
>>>> +
>>>> memcpy(&vreg->desc, rpm_data->desc, sizeof(vreg->desc));
>>>> vreg->desc.name = rpm_data->name;
>>>> vreg->desc.supply_name = rpm_data->supply;
>> Best Regards,
>> Devi Priya
Best Regards,
Devi Priya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-13 15:03 [PATCH 0/6] Add regulator support for IPQ9574 SoC devi priya
2023-01-13 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Add IPQ9574 compatible devi priya
2023-01-13 16:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-16 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2023-01-27 15:57 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-27 15:54 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-13 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Add IPQ9574 compatible string devi priya
2023-01-13 16:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-27 15:59 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-13 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] regulator: qcom_smd: Add MP5496 regulators devi priya
2023-01-13 15:24 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-01-27 16:01 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-27 16:03 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-01-31 10:16 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-13 15:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] regulator: qcom_smd: Add PMIC compatible for IPQ9574 devi priya
2023-01-17 18:38 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-27 16:05 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-27 20:12 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-31 10:22 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-13 15:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add cpufreq & RPM related nodes devi priya
2023-01-13 15:32 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-02 9:54 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-13 15:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] regulator: qcom_smd: Add support to define the bootup voltage devi priya
2023-01-13 15:37 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-01-27 16:07 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-27 16:10 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-01-31 9:28 ` Devi Priya [this message]
2023-01-31 12:44 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-02 11:09 ` Devi Priya
2023-02-02 11:43 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-06 13:48 ` Devi Priya
2023-01-31 9:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-02 11:09 ` Devi Priya
2023-02-06 22:30 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/6] Add regulator support for IPQ9574 SoC Bjorn Andersson
2023-02-08 6:09 ` Devi Priya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bb22160-5966-43d3-ffba-489b77b3a095@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_devipriy@quicinc.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_anusha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_arajkuma@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_gokulsri@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_kathirav@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_poovendh@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sjaganat@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_srichara@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox