From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www637.your-server.de (www637.your-server.de [168.119.26.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6476E258A; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 06:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.26.117 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757311530; cv=none; b=H/1muxZdA6gX9C30XqsU8DXBYtU6eiFnv+c8fk4HhbiOzLlSuEyBvPrnP3SMb8Kz3OSvppfg/cmzzBpa6z+FHU6B4LjgBoy8JD6mXfcu/W6xWRSw1vm/2f9ay9ikTjEf1pC5l5KkjRjHOzmfk21JyY0e57PyiDkvMWyXN0Y/LGs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757311530; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VEj+FcIjH8vMApuTrrOGRDhfsgKnPwgJ+AclFliyyyI=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=kCIwhxg1PhJgNB/XnCco/KDUtf4PkDu11LOueo9ScWkhXTx1j8az5WWhhFaFUnjmpwPZd/TXCOk9R5buAVsem8YmXyZTFKi2L/Dpj9BqdHrfYZxwDV/+4qdMdtVLnyY8WZhkVVos0LldVmsqpAjCpwU8tuZc9Ob5etOSingPLps= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=apitzsch.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=apitzsch.eu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apitzsch.eu header.i=@apitzsch.eu header.b=ZSggGL9x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.26.117 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=apitzsch.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=apitzsch.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apitzsch.eu header.i=@apitzsch.eu header.b="ZSggGL9x" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apitzsch.eu ; s=default2410; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=CfsdsKfiWnNioTv736ibRPWjiInLASEhVaU5adm2kiY=; b=ZSggGL9x2fLao5yLUtulafVKEw h2NETSUQYUi9xVEGccBOKY5ciDpfyeg585vJ96Dp3uDiYMvMlmKK1NJ3DaJtTEKyV8uTzKitJ4oRq yCxj/32EsoD9A3Seir6AXttsrv1Gw262ZQTD0menkt1+AkZ1cPweBvFgJz2RxozcTK50Dd82b0aIV jvKWKbv+a5QvpRtXCuU+ogeGTTh/oNBgULCi3U6N7Sl7Njc5nI/H97/0UQlHvhC5awKOeQhihQ95u juAeP9+rBj5jEmc4SDqpmAe9q83bcYTRNco+whefTqD4OVfuk5HRN5oTJH2duaTuT6jRWPVbwTbL7 bwgQg0QQ==; Received: from sslproxy07.your-server.de ([78.47.199.104]) by www637.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uvUfb-000Ed4-28; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 07:44:03 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by sslproxy07.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uvUfa-00088z-25; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 07:44:03 +0200 Message-ID: <6d875165ae2867fb0a49c19bdf18c0d948c783d3.camel@apitzsch.eu> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add CAMSS support for MSM8939 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Apitzsch To: Bryan O'Donoghue , Robert Foss , Todor Tomov , Vladimir Zapolskiy , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Knecht Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 07:44:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20250908-camss-8x39-vbif-v1-0-f198c9fd0d4d@apitzsch.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 1.0.9/27756/Sun Sep 7 10:26:39 2025) Hi Bryan, Am Montag, dem 08.09.2025 um 05:51 +0100 schrieb Bryan O'Donoghue: > On 07/09/2025 23:04, Andr=C3=A9 Apitzsch via B4 Relay wrote: > > (This series resumes [1].) >=20 > Thank you for following up on this. >=20 > Could you give a brief synopsis what changed between this series and > the previous series ? As Vincent seems currently quite busy I took over the series. Because of that I assumed I had to reset the revision number. At the end of the cover letter you can find what changed since the previous submission (v5 by Vincent), but I will add it here again in more details. - Patch 1 (bindings) (previously patch 3): - Make the order of {reg, clock, interrupt} items the same as in 8916 + append additional items - update isp node unit address - Drop R-b tag - Patch 2 (previously patch 1): no change - Patch 3 (previously patch 2): no change - Patch 4 (dts): - Make the order of {reg, clock, interrupt} items the same as in 8916 + append additional items - update isp node unit address - Drop R-b tag Best regards, Andr=C3=A9 >=20 > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250613-camss-8x39-vbif-v5-0-a002301a7730@= mailoo.org/ > Good series submission style would have something in the coverletter > like. >=20 > "Here is my awesome series of patches which do X >=20 > v2: > - Fixed everything wise and benevolent kernel community asked for >=20 > v1: > - Enabled cool stuff > " >=20 > I recall we were pretty close to picking these patches up previously > so thank you for re-upping your effort. >=20 > A brief bit of guidance on what if anything changed from your last=20 > submission is appreciated and good practice so that we can review and > apply quicker. >=20 > --- > bod