Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Enable the ldisc for ROME for x86 platforms.

rjliao
2019-03-12T09:01:59Z

在 2019-03-09 02:52，Matthias Kaehlcke 写道：
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:43:14AM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> On 2019-03-08 02:12, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > Hi Balakrishna,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 03:47:22PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
>> > > When using btattach to setup Rome over ldisc we observed a crash
>> > > in qca_setup as it will try to access the serdev which is not
>> > > available in the ldisc proto. This patch will fix the crash by
>> > > support both the ldisc and serdev way in the qca hci_uart driver.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org>
>> >
>> > Oh, I wasn't aware of the instantiation through ldisc and was actually
>> > considering to *remove* some of the seemingly unnecessary serdev
>> > checks.
>> >
>> > > ---
>> > > drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 47
>> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> > > index 237aea34b69f..0a5c98d46864 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> > > @@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static int qca_set_baudrate(struct hci_dev
>> > > *hdev, uint8_t baudrate)
>> > > {
>> > > struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>> > > struct qca_data *qca = hu->priv;
>> > > - struct qca_serdev *qcadev;
>> > > + struct qca_serdev *qcadev = NULL;
>> >
>> > In many cases the only field that is accessed is qcadev->btsoc_type. I
>> > think something like 'qca_get_soc_type(struct hci_dev *hdev / struct
>> > hci_uart *hu)' would make things more readable.
>> >
>> [Bala]: sure will update this in other patch once this change is
>> landed as
>> this has to
>> go in priority as we have crash coming.
>
> That's not how things should work, especially for fairly trivial
> changes. It requires reviewers to first spent time to review the patch
> that adds clutter and later spend more time to review the one that
> removes it. It's also easier to get a clean patch merged in the first
> place, rather than a noisy one.
>
> Anyway, here is my take at it:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1049014/
>
> Please help with testing for ROME, unless you disagree with the
> approach.
>
> Thanks
>
> Matthias

Hi Matthias,

I will test your patch and update to you, and you are correct that
AR3002 is not part of Rome family, you should use QCA_ROME as the
default return of qca_soc_type. Could you also loop me in
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1049014/?

Thanks,
Rocky