From: Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
agross@kernel.org
Cc: marijn.suijten@somainline.org,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Don't call __qcom_icc_set twice on the same node
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:30:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <783081e3-d78b-bf9c-cef4-af2df6888a72@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230303023500.2173137-1-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
On 3.03.23 4:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Currently, when sync_state calls set(n, n) all the paths for setting
> parameters on an icc node are called twice. Avoid that.
This could be optimized indeed.
> Fixes: 751f4d14cdb4 ("interconnect: icc-rpm: Set destination bandwidth as well as source bandwidth")
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> ---
> RFC comes from the fact that I *believe* this should be correct, but I'm
> not entirely sure about it..
>
>
> drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
> index a6e0de03f46b..d35db1af9b08 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
> ret = __qcom_icc_set(src, src_qn, sum_bw);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - if (dst_qn) {
> + if (dst_qn && src_qn != dst_qn) {
> ret = __qcom_icc_set(dst, dst_qn, sum_bw);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
Today we also call provider->set(node, node) in icc_node_add() to set
the initial bandwidth when nodes are being added to the topology. The
above change will affect that as well.
BR,
Georgi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-21 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-03 2:35 [RFC PATCH] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Don't call __qcom_icc_set twice on the same node Konrad Dybcio
2023-03-03 11:32 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-03-03 11:33 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-03-03 11:35 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-03-03 11:36 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-03-03 11:36 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-03-03 11:39 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-03-03 11:40 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-03-03 11:42 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-03-03 11:50 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-03-03 12:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-03-21 19:30 ` Georgi Djakov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=783081e3-d78b-bf9c-cef4-af2df6888a72@kernel.org \
--to=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox