[PATCH] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[PATCH] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[rtatiya]

From: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya@codeaurora.org>

USB 2.01+ full-speed devices can have extended descriptor as well
and can support LPM.

Change-Id: Ic055d51c02651810d3eb7141bab20a090fe8453b
Signed-off-by: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index 9ef2d2c..1ed7b5d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int usb_device_supports_lpm(struct usb_device *udev)
 	/* USB 2.1 (and greater) devices indicate LPM support through
 	 * their USB 2.0 Extended Capabilities BOS descriptor.
 	 */
-	if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH) {
+	if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH || udev->speed == USB_SPEED_FULL) {
 		if (udev->bos->ext_cap &&
 			(USB_LPM_SUPPORT &
 			 le32_to_cpu(udev->bos->ext_cap->bmAttributes)))
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, 
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:23:19PM +0530, rtatiya@codeaurora.org wrote:
> From: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya@codeaurora.org>
> 
> USB 2.01+ full-speed devices can have extended descriptor as well
> and can support LPM.
> 
> Change-Id: Ic055d51c02651810d3eb7141bab20a090fe8453b

We can't take patches with this in it, as it makes no sense in a kernel
changelog :(

Re: [PATCH] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[rtatiya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ]

> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:23:19PM +0530, rtatiya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org wrote:
>> From: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> USB 2.01+ full-speed devices can have extended descriptor as well
>> and can support LPM.
>>
>> Change-Id: Ic055d51c02651810d3eb7141bab20a090fe8453b
>
> We can't take patches with this in it, as it makes no sense in a kernel
> changelog :(
>
>

Sorry this is my first time (I read as much as I can before sending patch
but not enough I guess). Should I remove "From" line or rephrase commit
message?

Thanks,
Rupesh


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:27:40AM -0000, rtatiya@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:23:19PM +0530, rtatiya@codeaurora.org wrote:
> >> From: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya@codeaurora.org>
> >>
> >> USB 2.01+ full-speed devices can have extended descriptor as well
> >> and can support LPM.
> >>
> >> Change-Id: Ic055d51c02651810d3eb7141bab20a090fe8453b
> >
> > We can't take patches with this in it, as it makes no sense in a kernel
> > changelog :(
> >
> >
> 
> Sorry this is my first time (I read as much as I can before sending patch
> but not enough I guess). Should I remove "From" line or rephrase commit
> message?

>From line is fine.

Re: [PATCH] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[gpramod-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ]

>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:23:19PM +0530, rtatiya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org wrote:
>>> From: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>> USB 2.01+ full-speed devices can have extended descriptor as well
>>> and can support LPM.
>>>
>>> Change-Id: Ic055d51c02651810d3eb7141bab20a090fe8453b
>>
>> We can't take patches with this in it, as it makes no sense in a kernel
>> changelog :(
>>
>>
>
> Sorry this is my first time (I read as much as I can before sending patch
> but not enough I guess). Should I remove "From" line or rephrase commit
> message?

Rupesh, Just remove below line from commit message:

>>> Change-Id: Ic055d51c02651810d3eb7141bab20a090fe8453b

>
> Thanks,
> Rupesh
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

[PATCH v2] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[Rupesh Tatiya]

USB 2.01+ full-speed devices can have extended descriptor as well
and can support LPM.

Signed-off-by: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index 9ef2d2c..1ed7b5d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int usb_device_supports_lpm(struct usb_device *udev)
 	/* USB 2.1 (and greater) devices indicate LPM support through
 	 * their USB 2.0 Extended Capabilities BOS descriptor.
 	 */
-	if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH) {
+	if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH || udev->speed == USB_SPEED_FULL) {
 		if (udev->bos->ext_cap &&
 			(USB_LPM_SUPPORT &
 			 le32_to_cpu(udev->bos->ext_cap->bmAttributes)))
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, 
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[Oliver Neukum]

On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 12:23 +0530, rtatiya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org wrote:
> From: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> 
> USB 2.01+ full-speed devices can have extended descriptor as well
> and can support LPM.

Yes, they in theory can, but what happens if they are actually
asked to do so? On how many devices have you tested this patch?

	Regards
		Oliver


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] usb: Enable LPM for USB 2.01+ full-speed devices

[rtatiya]

>>
>> USB 2.01+ full-speed devices can have extended descriptor as well
>> and can support LPM.
>
> Yes, they in theory can, but what happens if they are actually
> asked to do so? On how many devices have you tested this patch?
>

I have tested this on Qualcomm USB controller, LPM works. LPM works with
same controller with Microsoft Windows as well. I have looked through few
Broadcom/CSR controllers, but could not find one that had USB version >=
2.01.

Thanks,
Rupesh