From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: add IPQ5210 pinctrl
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:38:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85415166-4d3e-4905-8122-de8ae66b8da1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <095ba19f-90c9-4410-9b65-607d29413bb1@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 30/03/2026 06:56, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>
> On 3/26/2026 1:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 01:05:15PM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>>> Add device tree bindings for IPQ5210 TLMM block.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy<kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> I don't see any differences here and cover letter does not explain that.
>
> Pin control function names are made generic for some of the functions,
> so I thought I should drop it and mentioned it in the cover letter as below.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Grouped the QUP SE pins instead of mentioning by function wise
> - Splitted the PWM functions which I messed up in V2
> - Audio primary and secondary mclk function names are expanded to avoid the
> confusion
> - Dropped the R-b tags due to the above changes
>
> Based on your comment, I understand that since there is no schematic
> changes to the binding, there is no need to drop the tag. So I have
> picked up the tags in V4.
So you dropped the tags because something changed in the "function"
property? Why would that matter for review?
I am not looking at this again.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-25 7:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] Introduce TLMM driver for Qualcomm IPQ5210 SoC Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2026-03-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: add IPQ5210 pinctrl Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2026-03-26 8:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-30 4:56 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2026-03-30 6:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-03-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: qcom: Introduce IPQ5210 TLMM driver Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2026-03-25 11:11 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-28 21:43 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-25 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Introduce TLMM driver for Qualcomm IPQ5210 SoC Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85415166-4d3e-4905-8122-de8ae66b8da1@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox