From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] PCI: protect restore with device lock to be consistent Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:39:50 -0400 Message-ID: <8696d4cf-144d-dbc0-1950-93d42529971a@codeaurora.org> References: <1506212218-29103-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20171011220819.GW25517@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171011220819.GW25517@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/2017 6:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I think this series makes a lot of sense overall; thanks for doing > this work! I had a few comments on the individual patches. > > (This response would ordinarily be to the cover letter, but there > isn't one, so I'm just responding to the first patch.) Thanks, I was too lazy to type it up. I'll do it on the next one. Since this was an RFC even though the subject doesn't say so, I didn't want to invest too much time on documentation. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.