Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: add new SPMI vibrator support

[Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>]

Hi Konrad,


On 4/11/2024 2:10 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
>> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV    (3100)
>> -#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV    (1200)
>> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS        (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV)
>> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV(vib)    (vib->drv2_addr ? (3544) : (3100))
> 
> You shouldn't need the additional inside parentheses
> 
> Also, is this really a good discriminator for the voltage ranges? Do *all*
> PMIC vibrators with a drv2_addr operate within this range? If not, consider
> a struct field here
> 
Currently, yes, all PMIC vibrators with a drv2_addr (PMI632, PM7250B, 
PM7325B, PM7550BA) operate within the same range because they are the 
same type.

> 
>> +#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib)    (vib->drv2_addr ? (1504) : (1200))
>> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS(vib)    (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV(vib) - 
>> VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib))
> 
> If the ranges are supposed to be inclusive, this is off-by-one. But looking
> at the driver, it seems like MIN_LEVEL may be "off"? I'm not sure though.
> 
> Either way, this would be a separate fix.
> [...]
The voltage range [1504, 3544] for the new SPMI vibrator is inclusive. I 
checked the voltage range [1200 3100] for PM8916 SPMI vibrator is also 
inclusive. I couldn't find any document to confirm if the SSBI vibrator 
but I assume it is the same as PM8916. I will make change before the 
series to address it.

Thanks for reviewing the changes!

Fenglin