Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Various dt-bindings for Milos and The Fairphone (Gen. 6) addition

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 11/3/25 1:23 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11/3/25 1:17 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> On Mon Nov 3, 2025 at 1:14 PM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 9/5/25 12:40 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> Document various bits of the Milos SoC in the dt-bindings, which don't
>>>> really need any other changes.
>>>>
>>>> Then we can add the dtsi for the Milos SoC and finally add a dts for
>>>> the newly announced The Fairphone (Gen. 6) smartphone.
>>>>
>>>> Dependencies:
>>>> * The dt-bindings should not have any dependencies on any other patches.
>>>> * The qcom dts bits depend on most other Milos patchsets I have sent in
>>>>   conjuction with this one. The exact ones are specified in the b4 deps.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> FWIW this looks good.. where are we with regards to the dependencies?
>>>
>>> Are we waiting for anything else than the PMIV0104 (as part of glymur/
>>> kaanapali)?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> From my side, I'm not aware of any patches that have any unresolved
>> comments, so I'm essentially just waiting for the correct maintainers to
>> pick up the variety of dt-bindings patches in this series, and the
>> PMIV0104 and PM7550 series.
>>
>> Any advice to make this actually proceed would be appreciated since most
>> have been waiting for quite a while.
> 
> Apparently I misremembered, kaanapali actually uses PMH0101 and PMH0110
> and PMH0104, whereas glymur uses pmh0101, pmcx0102, pmh0110 and pmh0104
> 
> (it is not easy indeed)
> 
> so it looks like PMIV0104 only showed up with your series.. and I'm not
> opposed to it, let me leave some review tags there, and I suppose I'll
> just ask you to rebase this series on next & make sure the bindings
> checker is happy

Well I apparently already left the review tags there.. please resend
all of them (2 pmics + this one) as a single v4

Konrad