From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B56AC433E1 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525DB207ED for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="TjzaJSFa" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726597AbgFKUHg (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:07:36 -0400 Received: from mail27.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.27]:17578 "EHLO mail27.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726441AbgFKUHf (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:07:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1591906055; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=2LcVzRPJEhV4O10eqHRYEY4V6niPeDTAOUYJlix3ses=; b=TjzaJSFavw1y4t94vmSdsDMQNi7bi3hvO/bVsRcKHNK64Br3mUUyogOk7DZ84T9lT41FwLa9 dw/dP1ObNvISlaP3nJ0mSezg5oEk82926HoMkLvtac+tWrRGRNXZS4SWAOH48w15R24aKFYo GVz57lwvj1ampH/Gj/BAyDIbArA= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.27 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI1MzIzYiIsICJsaW51eC1hcm0tbXNtQHZnZXIua2VybmVsLm9yZyIsICJiZTllNGEiXQ== Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n06.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5ee28efe117610c7ffda6af0 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:07:26 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EF3A7C433CB; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanmay) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66EBBC433C8; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:07:25 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:07:25 -0700 From: tanmay@codeaurora.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, seanpaul@chromium.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, chandanu@codeaurora.org, robdclark@gmail.com, abhinavk@codeaurora.org, nganji@codeaurora.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Vara Reddy Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] drm: add constant N value in helper file In-Reply-To: <159175565407.242598.7527036274929582020@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <20200609034047.9407-1-tanmay@codeaurora.org> <159175565407.242598.7527036274929582020@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Message-ID: <8b8d06e7331a0b8cbe3e674864c16f0c@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: tanmay@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 2020-06-09 19:20, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Tanmay Shah (2020-06-08 20:40:47) >> From: Chandan Uddaraju >> >> The constant N value (0x8000) is used by i915 DP >> driver. Define this value in dp helper header file >> to use in multiple Display Port drivers. Change >> i915 driver accordingly. >> >> Change in v6: Change commit message >> >> Signed-off-by: Chandan Uddaraju >> Signed-off-by: Vara Reddy >> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah >> --- > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > > Can you resend this series as an actual patch series? None of the > patches have the proper In-Reply-To headers so it is hard to track the > thread. Sure. Should I keep Message-ID of v5-patch-1 for in-reply-to header?