From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Andy Gross <agross-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Dan Williams
<dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 2/2] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add device tree binding
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:08:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9156959.vu4XdoKglI@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4916428.f0GtxdkWKj@wuerfel>
On Tuesday 28 January 2014 13:05:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2014 17:02:42 Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:17:57AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:16:53AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 28 January 2014 10:05:35 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > > > > Why does the direction needs to be specified in specifier? I see two
> > > > > options, either the direction per is fixed in hardware. In that case the DMA
> > > > > controller node should describe which channel is which direction. Or the
> > > > > direction is not fixed in hardware and can be changed at runtime in which
> > > > > case it should be set on a per descriptor basis.
> > > >
> > > > Normally the direction is implied by dmaengine_slave_config().
> > >
> > > No. The direction argument in there is deprecated - we've been talking
> > > about removing it for some time.
> > >
> > > DMA engine drivers should store all parameters of the configuration, and
> > > then select the appropriate ones when preparing a transfer (which itself
> > > involves a direction.)
> >
> > Right all the prep_ calls for slave cases have explcit direction argument so
> > sending it using slave config makes no sense. So will remove it after the merge
> > window closes and fix
>
> Ok, thanks for clearing up my mistake. However, the argument remains:
> the direction doesn't need to be in the DT DMA descriptor since it
> gets set by software anyway.
On a related note, should we try to remove the slave_id field from
the slave config structure as well? I believe it is still used by
the shmobile dma engine in non-DT mode, but that is inconsistent with
how all the others work, and with what the same driver does for DT.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 6:27 [Patch v3 0/2] Add Qualcomm BAM dmaengine driver Andy Gross
2014-01-28 6:27 ` [Patch v3 1/2] dmaengine: add Qualcomm BAM dma driver Andy Gross
2014-01-28 6:27 ` [Patch v3 2/2] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add device tree binding Andy Gross
2014-01-28 9:05 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-01-28 9:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-28 11:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-28 11:32 ` Vinod Koul
2014-01-28 12:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-28 12:08 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-01-28 12:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-29 15:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-28 13:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-28 19:50 ` Andy Gross
2014-01-30 6:23 ` Andy Gross
2014-01-28 19:47 ` Andy Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9156959.vu4XdoKglI@wuerfel \
--to=arnd-r2ngtmty4d4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=agross-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox