From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26AA52F3609; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761116354; cv=none; b=W1k6p+eiCtzyO6xrKa4BiNpzMOepoEYFSMAUgpao5w9QWxh5Zet8Dso1eg/puIE0BsaYYzScAIN60cKby0iwkS7lM0+AQUzwVv8KgG68blTcSSbwu46HKEhzCJG2cDyjwgIWm2XTRqPMD89q1ORCwKss+ELJ1aWGtFvhoy9XHqw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761116354; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fLm80y5DeCd7BjYiy8AWXL4fxOKpiG5SPopQ/f7y0Is=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=HiuT1W9mF1fILpp0rd9gE+i0MEQLsYQVMqXVZSS02LCeGn2/68mliwvVPGDvY8+Wf2uRvpLuAhRbzPgqYo47IoFOnajtyv1PHrUY5sT4SqMVcEJlk5NtLvoTkk1+Gu63FNItx+ZL/sPomVISem54zrXLd44RaH2kg4d1fzCWEt4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=MlHKaN0z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="MlHKaN0z" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279869.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 59M3wIwc024209; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:59:09 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh= 3i07+l+uWJPPHEU6fHn5Iyu6aez5sgkNVeYntCduk94=; b=MlHKaN0zeNzzmCbR 7x+V5qbFHvxVJAAIFu998asumKyIwVSB7oKZlsVU/OiGOZsO39anUkewRXsRLLIE Dnx6wiRu8sS3ylIwO42G7VxtEGE9ZfnR46I/jqXsIA3lhANAwF4PyuepNm43cOrr WVQhiUv7tb5LEjxzM4XQ4KMZ89axC8YbbXMIMjhzqL+B2cy89vAY/963SuzwtrLL t26IdZx+a68U/v3tJjbBiEEwg30VEWsHVZVLwxrzdp7+jXs+cJNkIZHOe5Xsw0M6 Za9ZvJoFEhXIIy4EgqbMJRi0Az/SbEm19ICAFMV0Shsnuo706sOhGHMSeTKRcvEd GB+lcw== Received: from nasanppmta04.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 49v1w83n68-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:59:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.52.223.231]) by NASANPPMTA04.qualcomm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 59M6x8um032737 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:59:08 GMT Received: from [10.151.36.184] (10.80.80.8) by nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.24; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 23:59:04 -0700 Message-ID: <96ae7d38-4ce0-fa34-e6f0-6bb6e4ceaa28@quicinc.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 12:29:01 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: spi-qpic-snand: Add IPQ5424 compatible Content-Language: en-US To: Mark Brown CC: , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20251014110534.480518-1-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com> <20251014110534.480518-2-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com> From: Md Sadre Alam In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMDE4MDAxNSBTYWx0ZWRfX0IPdfp5J8ZQN 4vea2Rd6y7a9Li+/jf5ZnuTKe2LCBc/BFHLL2hwQ+w45Ux4hfDMQusX48Q+/OIJFgIqLALzo++x +EbWMNQRvDTNwgMs7MMkuGjREUodxA6Fc/VkyUaeqndML5Nr5MYClf7tO7+WjE/Uilh1JTvBGDE lnDyxffENpj8kR7nFZUCXROymEFNn9FtNhvFyv3fDGvnvLVX7iWdHM/7bdPyzlb38k7TSfAxPWQ 3PKK7NeTdhnNyaZCqa4stfMp0NOnZO2tQ8p5Sykf7kYKEWM+DFkOmlgjLsGNzT1XIlU/nhMf+oq zbb6R7AuNsWnPxO262owqtaDhoZfVKAQKGfCVffFitYl/X9Akm8Z7O5bbpA953fVr+NoD0XBgEm EEtcTBEP6Hja5iFCIsdz8Flpipunkg== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=bNUb4f+Z c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68f880bd cx=c_pps a=JYp8KDb2vCoCEuGobkYCKw==:117 a=JYp8KDb2vCoCEuGobkYCKw==:17 a=GEpy-HfZoHoA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x6icFKpwvdMA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=_0GQtCzl9aOVDYM4pBEA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=zgiPjhLxNE0A:10 a=HhbK4dLum7pmb74im6QT:22 a=cPQSjfK2_nFv0Q5t_7PE:22 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=Ew2E2A-JSTLzCXPT_086:22 X-Proofpoint-GUID: t-5wmJQ0Ch1TLo2XtHsg-DecuLU4MTvU X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: t-5wmJQ0Ch1TLo2XtHsg-DecuLU4MTvU X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-10-22_02,2025-10-13_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510020000 definitions=main-2510180015 Hi, On 10/22/2025 12:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:35:26PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >> IPQ5424 contains the QPIC-SPI-NAND flash controller which is the same as >> the one found in IPQ9574. So let's document the IPQ5424 compatible and >> use IPQ9574 as the fallback. > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. Thank you for the feedback. I’d appreciate a bit more clarity on what “doesn't apply against current code” refers to in this context. I’ve manually applied the patch against the latest mainline (torvalds/linux) and it applied cleanly without any conflicts. Please let me know if there’s a specific tree or integration point I should be checking against. Thanks, Alam.