From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Stephen Boyd" Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/4] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay() Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <986071387c1fa1ede387ff36991a3df8.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> References: <1292883633-19553-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1292883633-19553-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:36704 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750984Ab1DEX3f (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 19:29:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Stephen Boyd , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Saravana Kannan , Daniel Walker , Nicolas Pitre , John Stultz , Brian Swetland , Arve =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , Andrew Morton > 2010/12/20 Stephen Boyd : > >> Some machines want to implement their own __delay() routine based >> on fixed rate timers. Expose functionality to set the __delay() >> routine at runtime. This should allow two machines with different >> __delay() routines to happily co-exist within the same kernel >> with minimal overhead. > > Can't you guys just put this into Russell's patch tracker now? > I think the issues raised have been adressed. > > Unless this happens I will attempt to rebase it and put it in > the patch tracker myself soon-ish. > Sorry, I'm about to send it now.