From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sricharan R Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/15] cpufreq: Add module to register cpufreq on Krait CPUs Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:13:59 +0530 Message-ID: <993dcf5e-a9b4-9434-08cf-7d385589800b@codeaurora.org> References: <1517890108-8140-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <1517890108-8140-15-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <20180206042642.GG28462@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:50886 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752267AbeBFEoH (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 23:44:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180206042642.GG28462@vireshk-i7> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org Hi Viresh, On 2/6/2018 9:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 06-02-18, 09:38, Sricharan R wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..5b988d4 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +// Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include "cpufreq-dt.h" >> +#include > > I don't think you need all of these anymore, isn't it ? Can you cross check > which ones are really required? For example, cpufreq-dt.h isn't required for > sure. > oops. Had this in mind to fix the headers. But missed it. Sorry, will fix and repost. >> +static int __init qcom_cpufreq_driver_init(void) >> +{ >> + struct device *cpu_dev; >> + struct device_node *np; >> + struct nvmem_cell *pvs_nvmem; >> + int ret; >> + >> + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0); >> + if (!cpu_dev) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + np = dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(cpu_dev); >> + if (!np) >> + return -ENOENT; >> + >> + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "operating-points-v2-krait-cpu")) { >> + of_node_put(np); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + pvs_nvmem = of_nvmem_cell_get(np, NULL); >> + if (IS_ERR(pvs_nvmem)) { >> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "Could not get nvmem cell\n"); >> + return PTR_ERR(pvs_nvmem); >> + } >> + >> + of_node_put(np); >> + >> + ret = qcom_cpufreq_populate_opps(pvs_nvmem); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + return PTR_ERR(platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt", >> + -1, NULL, 0)); > > Wanna do proper error handling here? For example, unset OPP name on failure here > so that resources get freed ? > ok, will fix things here. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation