Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: talos-evk: Add support for QCS615 talos evk board

[Anusha Ajithkumar <tessolveupstream@gmail.com>]

On 03-12-2025 02:36, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 12:16, <tessolveupstream@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14-11-2025 01:38, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 04:27:35PM +0530, Sudarshan Shetty wrote:
> 
>>>> +
>>>> +&uart0 {
>>>> +    status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&usb_1_hsphy {
>>>> +    vdd-supply = <&vreg_l5a>;
>>>> +    vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a>;
>>>> +    vdda-phy-dpdm-supply = <&vreg_l13a>;
>>>> +
>>>> +    status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&usb_qmpphy {
>>>> +    vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l5a>;
>>>> +    vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a>;
>>>> +
>>>> +    status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&usb_1 {
>>>> +    status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&usb_1_dwc3 {
>>>> +    dr_mode = "host";
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&usb_hsphy_2 {
>>>
>>> So, the labels are usb_1_hsphy, but usb_hsphy_2? That's not logical,
>>> please fix one of them. Then please fix the order of nodes here.
>>
>> The node names come directly from the included talos.dtsi, where they
>> are defined as usb_1_hsphy & usb_hsphy_2.
>> To avoid breaking inherited definitions, we kept the same labels
>> in our board DTS.
> 
> Please fix them in the base DT.
>

The inconsistent naming originates from talos.dtsi, which is 
outside the scope of this patch series. Modifying these labels 
in our board DTS would break the inherited node references 
from talos.dtsi. >> However, I will reorder the nodes so they appear in a logical and
>> consistent sequence.
> 
> This is a prerequisite, no questions.
>