From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Georgi Djakov Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/7] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add interconnect provider DT nodes Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 18:01:02 +0200 Message-ID: <9db2cd8c-62ad-1029-c1f5-7db272abc8de@linaro.org> References: <20181127180349.29997-1-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> <20181127180349.29997-7-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Evan Green Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, Michael Turquette , khilman@baylibre.com, Vincent Guittot , Saravana Kannan , Bjorn Andersson , amit.kucheria@linaro.org, seansw@qti.qualcomm.com, daidavid1@codeaurora.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, Alexandre Bailon , maxime.ripard@bootlin.com, Arnd Bergmann , thierry.reding@gmail.com, ksitaraman@nvidia.com, sanjayc@nvidia.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi Evan, On 12/1/18 02:39, Evan Green wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:04 AM Georgi Djakov wrote: >> >> From: David Dai >> >> Add RSC (Resource State Coordinator) provider >> dictating network-on-chip interconnect bus performance >> found on SDM845-based platforms. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Dai >> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi >> index b72bdb0a31a5..856d33604e9c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi >> @@ -1324,6 +1324,11 @@ >> compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk"; >> #clock-cells = <1>; >> }; >> + >> + qnoc: qnoc { >> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rsc-hlos"; >> + #interconnect-cells = <1>; >> + }; > > Should we alphabetize this node above rpmhcc? Sure! Thanks, Georgi