Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel@quicinc.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add coresight node for SM8650
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:07:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e54c828-0640-462a-9f91-0913504266f2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241210-sm8650-cs-dt-v2-1-cf24c6c9bddc@quicinc.com>

On 10/12/2024 09:23, Yuanfang Zhang wrote:
> Add coresight components: Funnel, ETE and ETF for SM8650.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com>
> ---

Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
explained here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters

> Changes in v2:
> - Update compatible for funnel and etf.
> - remove unnecessary property: reg-names and arm,primecell-periphid.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210-sm8650-cs-dt-v1-1-269693451584@quicinc.com
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 165 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
> index 25e47505adcb790d09f1d2726386438487255824..76620d478e872a2b725693dc32364e2a183572b7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
> @@ -5654,6 +5654,171 @@ compute-cb@12 {
>  				};
>  			};
>  		};
> +
> +		ete0 {

ete or ete-0

> +			compatible = "arm,embedded-trace-extension";
> +
> +			cpu = <&cpu0>;
> +			qcom,skip-power-up;
> +
> +			out-ports {
> +				port {
> +					ete0_out_funnel_ete: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_ete_in_ete0>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +
> +		funnel_ete {


Follow DTS coding style. Don't send us your downstream code.

> +			compatible = "arm,coresight-static-funnel";
> +
> +			in-ports {
> +				port@0 {
> +					reg = <0>;
> +
> +					funnel_ete_in_ete0: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&ete0_out_funnel_ete>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			out-ports {
> +				port {
> +					funnel_ete_out_funnel_apss: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_apss_in_funnel_ete>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +
> +		funnel@13810000 {

This is all wrongly placed. And tools would tell you that. But anyway,
do not introduce different style. Look how all other nodes are placed.

It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
`make dtbs_check W=1` (see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
for instructions).



> +			compatible = "arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel", "arm,primecell";
> +
> +			reg = <0x0 0x13810000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
> +			clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> +
> +			in-ports {
> +				port@0 {
> +					reg = <0>;
> +
> +					funnel_apss_in_funnel_ete: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_ete_out_funnel_apss>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			out-ports {
> +				port {
> +					funnel_apss_out_funnel_in1: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_in1_in_funnel_apss>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +
> +		funnel@10042000 {
> +			compatible = "arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel", "arm,primecell";
> +
> +			reg = <0x0 0x10042000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
> +			clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> +
> +			in-ports {
> +				port@4 {
> +					reg = <4>;
> +
> +					funnel_in1_in_funnel_apss: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_apss_out_funnel_in1>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			out-ports {
> +				port {
> +					funnel_in1_out_funnel_qdss: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_qdss_in_funnel_in1>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +
> +		funnel@10045000 {
> +			compatible = "arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel", "arm,primecell";
> +
> +			reg = <0x0 0x10045000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
> +			clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> +
> +			in-ports {
> +				#address-cells = <1>;
> +				#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				port@1 {
> +					reg = <1>;
> +
> +					funnel_qdss_in_funnel_in1: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_in1_out_funnel_qdss>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			out-ports {
> +				port {
> +					funnel_qdss_out_funnel_aoss: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_aoss_in_funnel_qdss>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +
> +		funnel@10b04000 {
> +			compatible = "arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel", "arm,primecell";
> +
> +			reg = <0x0 0x10b04000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
> +			clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> +
> +			in-ports {

It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
`make dtbs_check W=1` (see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
for instructions).

> +				port@7 {
> +					reg = <7>;
> +
> +					funnel_aoss_in_funnel_qdss: endpoint {
> +						remote-endpoint = <&funnel_qdss_out_funnel_aoss>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
Best regards,
Krzysztof

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-13  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-10  8:23 [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add coresight node for SM8650 Yuanfang Zhang
2024-12-11 10:48 ` neil.armstrong
2024-12-12  6:24   ` Yuanfang Zhang
2024-12-12 17:04 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-01-03 11:31   ` Yuanfang Zhang
2024-12-13  8:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-01-03 11:30   ` Yuanfang Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e54c828-0640-462a-9f91-0913504266f2@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox