From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/4] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay() Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 00:13:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1292883633-19553-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1292883633-19553-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:53564 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752027Ab1DEWNR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:13:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1292883633-19553-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Saravana Kannan , Daniel Walker , Nicolas Pitre , John Stultz , Brian Swetland , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arve_Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , Andrew Morton 2010/12/20 Stephen Boyd : > Some machines want to implement their own __delay() routine based > on fixed rate timers. Expose functionality to set the __delay() > routine at runtime. This should allow two machines with different > __delay() routines to happily co-exist within the same kernel > with minimal overhead. Can't you guys just put this into Russell's patch tracker now? I think the issues raised have been adressed. Unless this happens I will attempt to rebase it and put it in the patch tracker myself soon-ish. Yours, Linus Walleij