Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: Disable unused clocks after deferred probing is done

[Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>]

On 16 May 2013 06:34, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 05/09/2013 11:35 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>>
>> With deferred probing, late_initcall() is too soon to declare a clock as
>> unused. Wait for deferred probing to finish before declaring a clock as
>> unused. Since deferred probing is done in late_initcall(), do the unused
>> check to late_initcall_sync.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/clk.c |    2 +-
>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> index fe4055f..5ecb64c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int clk_disable_unused(void)
>>
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>> -late_initcall(clk_disable_unused);
>> +late_initcall_sync(clk_disable_unused);

Without giving this too much thinking... Will boot time be affected
with this change?

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson

>>
>>   /***    helper functions   ***/
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Thoughts? Picking it up? Removing the existing auto-disable code (I think
> they are still useful)?
>
> -Saravana
>
>
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/