Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add CAMSS support for SM6350

["Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>]

Hi Bryan,

On Tue Nov 18, 2025 at 10:33 AM CET, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 17/11/2025 12:53, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 11/16/25 3:30 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> On 14/11/2025 15:59, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> On Fri Nov 14, 2025 at 4:51 PM CET, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>>> On 14/11/2025 11:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>>>> Add bindings, driver and dts to support the Camera Subsystem on the
>>>>>> SM6350 SoC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These patches were tested on a Fairphone 4 smartphone with WIP sensor
>>>>>> drivers (Sony IMX576 and IMX582), the camera pipeline works properly as
>>>>>> far as I can tell.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Though when stopping the camera stream, the following clock warning
>>>>>> appears in dmesg. But it does not interfere with any functionality,
>>>>>> starting and stopping the stream works and debugcc is showing 426.4 MHz
>>>>>> while the clock is on, and 'off' while it's off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any suggestion how to fix this, is appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ 5738.590980] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>>> [ 5738.591009] gcc_camera_axi_clk status stuck at 'on'
>>>>>> [ 5738.591049] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6918 at drivers/clk/qcom/clk-branch.c:87 clk_branch_toggle+0x170/0x190
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have a full and complete kernel tree we could look at here ?
>>>>
>>>> Sure, this branch has everything in:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/sm6350-mainline/linux/tree/sm6350-6.17.y/
>>>>
>>>> For further refence, at least two other people have tested this branch
>>>> in postmarketOS, nothing particularly exciting to report from there,
>>>> apart from that the sdm-skin-thermal thermal zone (thermistor right next
>>>> to SoC) is currently configured with 55 degC as critical trip, which is
>>>> quickly achieved when starting a video recording, but that's not really
>>>> an issue with camss, but will need some tweaking regardless.
>>>>
>>>> https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/merge_requests/7281
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm6350.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm6350.c
>>> index a4d6dff9d0f7f..229629ef82809 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm6350.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm6350.c
>>> @@ -908,9 +908,7 @@ static struct clk_branch gcc_camera_ahb_clk = {
>>>
>>>   static struct clk_branch gcc_camera_axi_clk = {
>>>          .halt_reg = 0x17018,
>>> -       .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
>>> -       .hwcg_reg = 0x17018,
>>> -       .hwcg_bit = 1,
>> 
>> No reason to drop the hwcg description
>> 
>>> +       .halt_check = BRANCH_VOTED,
>> 
>> It'd be useful to explain why we should ignore the hw feedback in this case
>> 
>>>          .clkr = {
>>>                  .enable_reg = 0x17018,
>>>                  .enable_mask = BIT(0),
>> 
>> Konrad
>
> vfe170 is what we have on sdm845
>
> So I'm just asking Luca to try the sdm845 method of waggling this clock 
> since what we have doesn't work.

Yes, your change to gcc-sm6350.c does remove the warning and everything
seems to work as expected. Opening and closing the plasma-camera
application, switching between cameras works without any visible issues.

Regards
Luca

>
> ---
> bod