From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900AAC4332F for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230348AbiKAPLA (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:11:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59952 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230518AbiKAPIt (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:08:49 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127361EC4F; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 08:01:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1667314918; x=1698850918; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JQ1lTj2lqZx7DC5afP1JL1wnOdepQj60udlfX3dHNyI=; b=XGSfFNqterg2zKIKYqZwlxKkvIyG4QYxLOkUnTINgy6KWBGGqkg9li7q klNxTSRLec+PpE6hShJfXwtmNbrOxOZ4ftbiK3nqd5rbZ3ne9zx1qyYEE 4UXkeUgIIribT73ZxDUgu4zGKczza9ilKDbRKXgp0l5sAKIYqojCNwLaX S7l5vaDKZ+mnr1KmA5o9QYuvcb3mT1B9b+ghpQlH9OEQS19cUcLt+5x/P MZeHnJPKkAbd/Pa8JKDH7i/+dfrKCnjptpdx2zWxRqxR1m6q8zo7uTlDP BOQ0hZpCXjOUmMXkNhjleEMB0fhHu1NuU8Yl7NBbV1Ja/mSvFGG8nQeJ0 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10518"; a="289544198" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,231,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="289544198" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Nov 2022 08:01:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10518"; a="636424912" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,231,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="636424912" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2022 08:01:25 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1opslY-005dfY-0X; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:01:24 +0200 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 17:01:23 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij , Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , Konrad Dybcio , kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: Add missed bitfield.h Message-ID: References: <20221027184145.2533-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221027184145.2533-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 09:41:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Previously the cleanup change dropped the bitfield.h from the > pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h, since it's not used there, but forgot to > re-instantiate it in the C-file, where users are located. > > Fix this by adding missed bitfield.h to the C-file. Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko