From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A659EC2B9F4 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7467560FD8 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229697AbhFYRPO (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:15:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38072 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229630AbhFYRPO (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:15:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2859AC061768 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id m17so5038161plx.7 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:12:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5t9z6ncjTfDboZM5CMH67oHu1/rwNvPtcXLXms6Lyjk=; b=ZGd6Jo2iJFy0vt8+khjkWytwPXHyJrdTJ/cc4nRGr+ruQ9YLKnGqe/Lu68TfP57DTq JFKJl6VEcevctxq7I1MItVsPVWIc23jk82XYZw8bAP9oFGN4Rn0UEdNbh7qYg+KWNeZY 3f5SnT4C9NVj30SoJ5yCmIRXZ8+V8Jls7rJZM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5t9z6ncjTfDboZM5CMH67oHu1/rwNvPtcXLXms6Lyjk=; b=bhc75xMnR5xf/kBHYBG7goxzo7v3VVE8kO14Tvx2wkdtQWFMyAapI10iynX96c1LpK 4ea998VMDLCWAiPgEl9yprlfatNrI6iDMpeIeS8opo0Ye4i0UUsp60XmPxwnh2y1ooFj m2gtXqCn3i89kv7aYxPDkC/Xer401NePXEPue7OFOCO1oMhs/GVUlJ0/GU2UQkf681+t 2yATRbsjMWLnlKwmfmC+DbUujvUGKlElsljUBPLH7XPCAFvrj9ukDBTAvczzZWGybFsR NKS2HWYV69HEM7smpSvuij6dLUptLeUEb9Rn0bhgUU0MwOKoAjepkSptVH623oT3LTnW iJkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Kv8jnG+X7UQyZ7WgXHh5zDZcCFUPr1DbAf3HXuG/cF9eRR1Pm kqWYRvixQsmM7aeNfe1qNuPuwg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTSyIG1tO8wfl096x6dYZqGyOAeZ/K0sXsK5rsKTqVdlp02LhSN7W7b1dwOVC6174Joh4ZaA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:46c3:: with SMTP id jx3mr12084967pjb.206.1624641172552; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:202:201:cc13:a7dd:f4b5:2160]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id b10sm5823890pfi.122.2021.06.25.10.12.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:12:50 -0700 From: Matthias Kaehlcke To: Sibi Sankar Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, ohad@wizery.com, agross@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, evgreen@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org, swboyd@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add SC7280 MPSS support Message-ID: References: <1624564058-24095-1-git-send-email-sibis@codeaurora.org> <1624564058-24095-2-git-send-email-sibis@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1624564058-24095-2-git-send-email-sibis@codeaurora.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 01:17:30AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > Add MPSS PAS support for SC7280 SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar On which tree is this series based? I guess it must be the remoteproc tree since the conversion of the binding to YAML isn't in Linus' tree yet, however the patch doesn't apply cleanly against remoteproc/for-next: patching file Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,adsp.yaml Hunk #2 succeeded at 144 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 285 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 416 with fuzz 2 (offset 23 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 492 (offset 25 lines). Hunk #6 FAILED at 485.