From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Kathiravan T <kathirav@codeaurora.org>,
agross@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add SMEM support
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:18:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUurqDL/S15RziCQ@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOX2RU5+jeXiqz8oss8Sd-BWa059uAv5xu=7nx_YF4RYpG2S6w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed 22 Sep 15:23 CDT 2021, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 08:24, Kathiravan T <kathirav@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-09-20 14:55, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 04:52, Bjorn Andersson
> > > <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu 02 Sep 16:47 CDT 2021, Robert Marko wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > IPQ8074 uses SMEM like other modern QCA SoC-s, so since its already
> > >> > supported by the kernel add the required DT nodes.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for your patch Robert.
> > >>
> > >> > ---
> > >> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi
> > >> > index a620ac0d0b19..83e9243046aa 100644
> > >> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi
> > >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi
> > >> > @@ -82,6 +82,29 @@ scm {
> > >> > };
> > >> > };
> > >> >
> > >> > + reserved-memory {
> > >> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > >> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > >> > + ranges;
> > >> > +
> > >> > + smem_region: memory@4ab00000 {
> > >> > + no-map;
> > >> > + reg = <0x0 0x4ab00000 0x0 0x00100000>;
> > >> > + };
> > >> > + };
> > >> > +
> > >> > + tcsr_mutex: hwlock {
> > >> > + compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
> > >> > + syscon = <&tcsr_mutex_regs 0 0x80>;
> > >>
> > >> Since it's not okay to have a lone "syscon" and I didn't think it was
> > >> worth coming up with a binding for the TCSR mutex "syscon" I rewrote
> > >> the
> > >> binding a while back. As such qcom,tcsr-mutex should now live in /soc
> > >> directly.
> > >>
> > >> So can you please respin accordingly?
> > >
> > > Sure, can you just confirm that the:
> > > reg = <0x01905000 0x8000>;
> > >
> > > Is the whole TCSR range as I don't have docs?
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > TCSR_MUTEX block starts from 0x01905000 and has size 0x20000 (128KB)
>
> Thanks, Kathiravan,
> TSCR mutex with MMIO reg under it works, but there is some weird probe
> ordering issue.
>
> For whatever reason, SMEM will get probed only after MTD does and this
> will cause issues
> if SMEM parser is used as it will return -EPROBE_DEFER but the MTD
> core does not really
> handle it correctly and causes the device to reboot after failed parsing.
>
> Now, I have no idea why does this variant which uses MMIO regmap probe
> so much later?
>
Mani, do you have any input related to the probe deferral of the SMEM
partition parser, because SMEM not yet probed?
Thanks,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 21:47 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add SMEM support Robert Marko
2021-09-20 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-09-20 9:25 ` Robert Marko
2021-09-21 6:24 ` Kathiravan T
2021-09-22 20:23 ` Robert Marko
2021-09-22 22:18 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2021-10-06 18:05 ` Robert Marko
2021-10-06 18:13 ` Robert Marko
2021-10-06 18:24 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-10-06 18:26 ` Robert Marko
2021-10-06 18:44 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-10-06 19:09 ` Robert Marko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YUurqDL/S15RziCQ@builder.lan \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kathirav@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robimarko@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).