From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1F4C433F5 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA2A60EB4 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241027AbhJ0Uh7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:37:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:43628 "EHLO mail-ot1-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240876AbhJ0Uh7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:37:59 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f42.google.com with SMTP id y15-20020a9d460f000000b0055337e17a55so5361041ote.10; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:35:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CyGyYZdhYAxTp2bbhNRVqGd+98xW6EZ+Baip4Aw2eW8=; b=iMuuix7ZodzOZo2ERfhA59EActs4bQh4sTcYjacR5Mw8t9XhtqIeWurYOxUGUg21IR JrwO7R03WqC0V/Xhrz3y8SHtrJDTVVhSRhkfegfYsDDbp/6XlUQ9EbxAdlDfmXp59XlI RDl7pifdLyKei84PT3PuXTnD9eZ8i3OdGImnxtN0Y4jdpoPfFzPLa+RRJuP44tI0uAfL ETQ9PrrESRZzDQ+q3XTo6IFvinIJC9kytbuYhDPpqAn7lgqwwZTH9tZBbR590AJwR+ZR Hh3yZL5FUs/xHaBPDQ0FRDXr/XMC1r0LvGvL6q/umXkONxfliK1OKFHWuU4ENcG1ZapC x9nQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Er1EzeNRuNUJJi0+zJJLt7/mHs1giqnSsDZYU95fsRkLYu7fS woZ7qOkFhnofRelYiPcaIyyS3lRV2Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIzAAGsUj6XwSFuF9o4E/LSFkzNu3ITGDixh2XBXxTAFF8hU7P3IMZv06Py4H11765HxvAcA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:bab:: with SMTP id 40mr2786oth.274.1635366933241; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-148-213.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.148.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m13sm357996oou.25.2021.10.27.13.35.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2107680 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:35:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:35:31 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Yassine Oudjana Cc: Andy Gross , Marijn Suijten , ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, Bjorn Andersson , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio , Shawn Guo , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Georgi Djakov , Dmitry Baryshkov , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 1/5] dt-bindings: interconnect: Combine SDM660 bindings into RPM schema Message-ID: References: <20211021132329.234942-1-y.oudjana@protonmail.com> <20211021132329.234942-2-y.oudjana@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211021132329.234942-2-y.oudjana@protonmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:24:25 +0000, Yassine Oudjana wrote: > SDM660 interconnect bindings are similar to other RPM interconnect > providers, and now it shares the same common driver with them, so > it is better to combine them into qcom,rpm.yaml. > > Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana > --- > .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpm.yaml | 103 +++++++++- > .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm660.yaml | 185 ------------------ > 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm660.yaml > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring