From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add cpufreq support
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 12:41:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbGsD4gbO2zGuVVy@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <725e7ac2-c4b1-8908-585f-d05d72bc7a95@somainline.org>
On 01-12-21, 16:28, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
> On 01.12.2021 08:29, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
> >
> > The change adds a description of a SM8450 cpufreq-epss controller and
> > references to it from CPU nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> [...]
>
>
> >
> > + cluster1 {
> > core4 {
> > cpu = <&CPU4>;
> > };
> > @@ -182,7 +192,9 @@ core5 {
> > core6 {
> > cpu = <&CPU6>;
> > };
> > + };
> >
> > + cluster2 {
> > core7 {
> > cpu = <&CPU7>;
> > };
>
> Weren't DynamIQ-enabled SoCs supposed to be treated as single-cluster
>
> from the Linux POV? Or has it changed again with the new chips?
I discussed with Bjorn and yes we should have a single cluster for this.
will fix
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-01 7:29 [PATCH 00/15] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for SM8450 SoC and QRD board Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 01/15] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base SM8450 DTSI Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:03 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-06 5:39 ` Vinod Koul
2021-12-07 14:35 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-07 14:53 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 02/15] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base SM8450 QRD DTS Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:05 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 03/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add tlmm nodes Vinod Koul
2021-12-07 14:37 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 04/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-qrd: Add reserved gpio range for QRD Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:07 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-06 5:53 ` Vinod Koul
2021-12-07 14:56 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 05/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add reserved memory nodes Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:11 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-06 5:42 ` Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 06/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add smmu nodes Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:13 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 07/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-qrd: Add rpmh regulator nodes Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:14 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 08/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add ufs nodes Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:16 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 09/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-qrd: enable " Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:18 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-06 5:58 ` Vinod Koul
2021-12-07 15:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 10/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add interconnect nodes Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:20 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-06 6:12 ` Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 11/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add spmi node Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:22 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 12/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-qrd: include pmic files Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:23 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-07 15:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-07 15:51 ` Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 13/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add rpmhpd node Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:24 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 14/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add cpufreq support Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-09 7:11 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2021-12-01 7:29 ` [PATCH 15/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add i2c13 and i2c14 device nodes Vinod Koul
2021-12-01 15:30 ` Konrad Dybcio
2021-12-09 7:13 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbGsD4gbO2zGuVVy@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox