Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] Revert "arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add EUD dt node and dwc3 connector"

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 01:21:36PM +0530, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote:
> Revert all the changes to add the Embedded USB Debugger(EUD) Node
> in the device tree, the connector node and also changes to usb2 Node
> associated with this.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 36 ------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 96917fe..937c2e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -2583,12 +2583,6 @@
>  				phys = <&usb_2_hsphy>;
>  				phy-names = "usb2-phy";
>  				maximum-speed = "high-speed";
> -				usb-role-switch;
> -				port {
> -					usb2_role_switch: endpoint {
> -						remote-endpoint = <&eud_ep>;
> -					};
> -				};
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> @@ -2630,36 +2624,6 @@
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  		};
>  
> -		eud: eud@88e0000 {
> -			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-eud","qcom,eud";
> -			reg = <0 0x88e0000 0 0x2000>,
> -			      <0 0x88e2000 0 0x1000>;
> -			interrupts-extended = <&pdc 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> -			ports {
> -				port@0 {
> -					eud_ep: endpoint {
> -						remote-endpoint = <&usb2_role_switch>;
> -					};
> -				};
> -				port@1 {
> -					eud_con: endpoint {
> -						remote-endpoint = <&con_eud>;
> -					};
> -				};
> -			};
> -		};
> -
> -		eud_typec: connector {
> -			compatible = "usb-c-connector";
> -			ports {
> -				port@0 {
> -					con_eud: endpoint {
> -						remote-endpoint = <&eud_con>;
> -					};
> -				};
> -			};
> -		};
> -
>  		nsp_noc: interconnect@a0c0000 {
>  			reg = <0 0x0a0c0000 0 0x10000>;
>  			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-nsp-noc";
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches and resend it after
  adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of the
  email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
  email signature.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot