From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/gpu: Avoid -Wunused-function with !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:15:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlRwUb3ZXyWItt+W@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4deb0930-b244-677a-9f97-3730686eff5a@linaro.org>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 03:53:01AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 30/03/2022 21:05, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > When building with CONFIG_PM=y and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n (such as ARCH=riscv
> > allmodconfig), the following warnings/errors occur:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c:679:12: error: 'adreno_system_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> > 679 | static int adreno_system_resume(struct device *dev)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c:655:12: error: 'adreno_system_suspend' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> > 655 | static int adreno_system_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > These functions are only used in SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(), which
> > evaluates to empty when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, making these
> > functions unused.
> >
> > Traditionally, these functions are marked as __maybe_unused but in this
> > case, there is already an '#ifdef CONFIG_PM' in the code, so just do the
> > same thing with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to resolve the warning.
> >
> > Fixes: 7e4167c9e021 ("drm/msm/gpu: Park scheduler threads for system suspend")
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
>
> I'd suggest using __maybe_unused instead (and maybe even sending the
> followup patch changing the #ifdef CONFIG_PM to __maybe_unused too):
>
> If the code is included into the compilation, it means it's more widely
> compile tested. Which tends to reveal obscure bugs, dependencies, etc.
Thanks, I looked into it and there was a recent rework of the PM macros
that allows us to eliminate the existing #ifdef. I have sent v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/20220411181249.2758344-1-nathan@kernel.org/
Cheers,
Nathan
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > index 661dfa7681fb..b25915230bab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static int adreno_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > return gpu->funcs->pm_suspend(gpu);
> > }
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > static void suspend_scheduler(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > {
> > int i;
> > @@ -681,8 +682,8 @@ static int adreno_system_resume(struct device *dev)
> > resume_scheduler(dev_to_gpu(dev));
> > return pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> > }
> > -
> > -#endif
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
> > static const struct dev_pm_ops adreno_pm_ops = {
> > SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(adreno_system_suspend, adreno_system_resume)
> >
> > base-commit: 05241de1f69eb7f56b0a5e0bec96a7752fad1b2f
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-11 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-30 18:05 [PATCH] drm/msm/gpu: Avoid -Wunused-function with !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-11 0:53 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-11 18:15 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlRwUb3ZXyWItt+W@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox