From: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@quicinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
<adrian.hunter@intel.com>, <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com>, <quic_zhgao@quicinc.com>,
<quic_yuanjiey@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable aggressive PM
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:01:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0a1vdps0wHidSll@cse-cd02-lnx.ap.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <zrqcbghhhpmr2dknipkmqxcxcxnlqr4ury4haqq4n6xja5lc7p@6gh56cndcwjl>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 06:00:34AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:17:08AM +0800, Yuanjie Yang wrote:
> > The sdhci-msm driver supports the device in both RUNNING
> > and IDLE states, when eMMC/SD are not reading or writing,
> > eMMC/SD are in IDLE state, the power management module
> > will suspend the device(power off and reduce frequency,
> > etc.), putting the device into a low-power mode. But the
> > current sdhci-msm driver cannot put device enter into
> > low-power mode.
> >
> > Enable aggressive PM capability to support runtime PM
> > functionality, allowing the eMMC/SD card to enter
> > lowe-power mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@quicinc.com>
>
> What is the difference to [1] ?
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20241104060722.10642-1-quic_sartgarg@quicinc.com
Thanks for your reminder, I didn't notice there was already a patch. I'll
check upstream first in the future. I will close this patch.
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > index e00208535bd1..e3444d223513 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > @@ -2627,6 +2627,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY | MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY;
> > + msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM;
> >
> > /* Set the timeout value to max possible */
> > host->max_timeout_count = 0xF;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Thanks,
Yuanjie
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-27 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-27 3:17 [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable aggressive PM Yuanjie Yang
2024-11-27 4:00 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-11-27 6:01 ` Yuanjie Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0a1vdps0wHidSll@cse-cd02-lnx.ap.qualcomm.com \
--to=quic_yuanjiey@quicinc.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_zhgao@quicinc.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox