From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>,
"Aiqun Yu (Maria)" <quic_aiquny@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-pmics: Enable all SMB2360 separately
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:27:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1hBuliHmuOkqTZj@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241210-x1e80100-disable-smb2360-v2-1-2449be2eca29@linaro.org>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:36:01AM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> At the moment, x1e80100-pmics.dtsi enables two of the SMB2360 PMICs by
> default and leaves the other two disabled. The third one was originally
> also enabled by default, but then disabled in commit a237b8da413c ("arm64:
> dts: qcom: x1e80100: Disable SMB2360_2 by default"). This is inconsistent
> and confusing. Some laptops will even need SMB2360_1 disabled by default if
> they just have a single USB-C port.
>
> Make this consistent by keeping all SMB2360 disabled in x1e80100-pmics.dtsi
> and enable them separately for all boards where needed. That way it is
> always clear which ones are available and avoids accidentally trying to
> read/write from missing chips when some of the PMICs are not present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Makes perfect sense:
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-10 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-10 8:36 [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-pmics: Enable all SMB2360 separately Stephan Gerhold
2024-12-10 13:27 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2024-12-10 21:42 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-12-11 13:56 ` Abel Vesa
2024-12-17 16:38 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1hBuliHmuOkqTZj@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_aiquny@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stephan.gerhold@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox