Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/msm/a6xx: Print GMU core firmware version at boot
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:35:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z64fUjIfFzs4R8Im@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241219-topic-gmu_fw_ver-v1-2-d403a70052d8@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 24-12-19 23:36:56, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> Log the version for informational purposes, such as for keeping track
> of possible GMU fw-related failures in crash / CI logs.
> 
> Intentionally not implemented on the if (gmu->legacy) codepath, as
> these registers seem not to be used on there.
> 
> Downstream additionally warns if the firmware version is too old for
> a given GPU, but we already pair the binary to a given GPU, so let's
> not go there at the moment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> index 14db7376c712d19446b38152e480bd5a1e0a5198..a7ea2b2af1dc3816906236df929df36e37d8f606 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_load(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>  	const struct firmware *fw_image = adreno_gpu->fw[ADRENO_FW_GMU];
>  	const struct block_header *blk;
>  	u32 reg_offset;
> +	u32 ver;
>  
>  	u32 itcm_base = 0x00000000;
>  	u32 dtcm_base = 0x00040000;
> @@ -775,6 +776,12 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_load(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	ver = gmu_read(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION);
> +	DRM_INFO("Loaded GMU firmware v%u.%u.%u\n",
> +		 FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_MAJOR__MASK, ver),
> +		 FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_MINOR__MASK, ver),
> +		 FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_STEP__MASK, ver));

I get the following spam:

[  109.928924] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10
[  110.301295] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10
[  110.472620] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10
[  111.164303] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10
[  111.864830] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10
...

Stacktrace shows this being called from runtime resume:

[   19.380390] Call trace:
[   19.380391]  show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
[   19.380399]  dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x84
[   19.380403]  dump_stack+0x18/0x24
[   19.380405]  a6xx_gmu_resume+0x450/0xc44 [msm]
[   19.380426]  a6xx_gmu_pm_resume+0x34/0x220 [msm]
[   19.380437]  adreno_runtime_resume+0x28/0x34 [msm]
[   19.380446]  pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x28/0x3c
[   19.380451]  __rpm_callback+0x84/0x390
[   19.380453]  rpm_resume+0x3d0/0x5c0
[   19.380455]  __pm_runtime_resume+0x4c/0x94
[   19.380457]  adreno_get_param+0xdc/0x274 [msm]
[   19.380466]  msm_ioctl_get_param+0x5c/0x68 [msm]
[   19.380475]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xd4/0x10c [drm]
[   19.380491]  drm_ioctl+0x26c/0x40c [drm]
[   19.380499]  __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x90/0xcc
[   19.380503]  invoke_syscall+0x40/0xf8
[   19.380505]  el0_svc_common+0xac/0xdc
[   19.380506]  do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
[   19.380508]  el0_svc+0x34/0x7c
[   19.380512]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x108
[   19.380513]  el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c

So maybe DRM_INFO_ONCE instead ?

> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-19 22:36 [PATCH 0/2] Print GMU version at boot on >A630 Konrad Dybcio
2024-12-19 22:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/msm: registers: Add GMU FW version register Konrad Dybcio
2024-12-19 22:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/msm/a6xx: Print GMU core firmware version at boot Konrad Dybcio
2025-02-13 16:35   ` Abel Vesa [this message]
2025-02-13 16:41     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2025-02-13 16:47       ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-01-02 20:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] Print GMU version at boot on >A630 Akhil P Oommen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z64fUjIfFzs4R8Im@linaro.org \
    --to=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox