From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24DD022FF20; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739195249; cv=none; b=qwz9P7oaFZDySO9HpdoDEeA+88mjI/Sr/0NGXx11YlP72nPwNrVxzKt8/BMALqp5b1dJQIDpY7RkzP2SEk+4UnBgGalOCSw1l92urWVknzv3Bx/R2WOY6VZhShDxUQajw0JOYzG0UG7x0dnw8i0AZkz9pIEwoyMucjQ6xm5a5oM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739195249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GQIg/qzTkdQt12XkEzoqVOvjfLXCEHK3wkZK2PhNg1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ieTjPiSPv9+B09NbC7pp8xIKMrtBgOEyjz2uazIfdt3T5BIWMJK0sPwgHVgP111ZmnGYOnUwqYkv32iR/vs9794KE+PVTm47bhcjbVXK9W7MZdnNr11KpBxiD489jUEj5vR3fUwuXVFRgv3gGlSNR2kcFupkFoU9h7T8pmv3K0M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tf2Tutfz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tf2Tutfz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D1E6C4CED1; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:47:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739195248; bh=GQIg/qzTkdQt12XkEzoqVOvjfLXCEHK3wkZK2PhNg1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tf2Tutfz+qg+Uazg4hu74ykNZqF9v7tZfIiTps68lSnloHakqUV7/NDEV7oHPecTA kvlGEynA5YMQda9POZ6yZ6wvZPaHj2k5cWiMtsbPIz+s03HRVHUxhN6lHgMmQMrGcF 3MCpTR22toIUmJCN0qlGjbUZS8kQV+j3CKYcwdP9pfUmSokMuI2xOxXlpzOT/1W8F2 pHZW/UlPNARPmERYGTPARe/mKjvxv6rPpqJVtdvPMw7ApoGzhcBpt5TiuTA68FeS63 ABymp8UOKj3WE31htwjwRCsYpL4tQnTGeHkBu/STlRwSz2OWzejvDsZbqLqeJZnaPM OXR/0Y3dLR3pg== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1thU8M-000000003zl-0CKj; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:47:34 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:47:34 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Jie Gan Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio , Yushan Li Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add coresight nodes for x1e80100 Message-ID: References: <20241205054904.535465-1-quic_jiegan@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241205054904.535465-1-quic_jiegan@quicinc.com> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:49:03PM +0800, Jie Gan wrote: > Add following coresight components for x1e80100 platform. > It includes CTI, dummy sink, dynamic Funnel, Replicator, STM, > TPDM, TPDA and TMC ETF. > > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio > Tested-by: Yushan Li > Signed-off-by: Jie Gan This patch is now in 6.14-rc1 and results in the logs being spammed with 200+ messages about cyclic dependencies. I'd expect something like this to at least be mentioned in the commit message: [ 0.250732] /soc@0/stm@10002000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10041000 [ 0.250854] /soc@0/tpda@10004000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10041000 [ 0.250881] /soc@0/tpda@10004000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/tpdm@1000f000 [ 0.251011] /soc@0/tpdm@1000f000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/tpda@10004000 [ 0.251128] /soc@0/funnel@10041000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10045000 [ 0.251155] /soc@0/funnel@10041000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/stm@10002000 [ 0.251184] /soc@0/funnel@10041000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/tpda@10004000 [ 0.251251] /soc@0/funnel@10042000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10045000 [ 0.251329] /soc@0/funnel@10042000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10c2c000 [ 0.251359] /soc@0/funnel@10042000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10ac5000 [ 0.251388] /soc@0/funnel@10042000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10cc5000 [ 0.251449] /soc@0/funnel@10045000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10b04000 [ 0.251538] /soc@0/funnel@10045000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10042000 [ 0.251571] /soc@0/funnel@10045000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10041000 ... [ 0.301268] /soc@0/tpda@10d12000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/tpdm@10d08000 [ 0.301462] /soc@0/tpda@10d12000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10d13000 [ 0.301520] /soc@0/funnel@10d04000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10d13000 [ 0.301582] /soc@0/funnel@10d13000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/funnel@10d04000 [ 0.301639] /soc@0/funnel@10d13000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc@0/tpda@10d12000 [ 0.317624] Callback from call_rcu_tasks() invoked. Has anyone looked into what is causing this and if anything can be done about it? This is taking a fair amount of time to process and print. Johan