From: Adrien Thierry <athierry@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] phy: qcom-snps-femto-v2: add system sleep PM ops
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:08:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJslqaHZqdizSGbc@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52qapxj7sdearduro3iiqqpekrltc5zviwgq3gz4j4lne6cp5b@phikpenjras3>
Hi Bjorn,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 02:43:07PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 03:40:19PM -0400, Adrien Thierry wrote:
> > The downstream driver [1] implements set_suspend(), which deals with
> > both runtime and system sleep/resume. The upstream driver already has
> > runtime PM ops, so add the system sleep PM ops as well, reusing the same
> > code as the runtime PM ops.
> >
> > [1] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-5.4/-/blob/LV.AU.1.2.1.r2-05300-gen3meta.0/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-snps-hs.c
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrien Thierry <athierry@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
> > index ce1d2f8b568a..378a5029f61e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
> > @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static inline void qcom_snps_hsphy_write_mask(void __iomem *base, u32 offset,
> > readl_relaxed(base + offset);
> > }
> >
> > -static int qcom_snps_hsphy_suspend(struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy)
> > +static int qcom_snps_hsphy_do_suspend(struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy)
> > {
> > dev_dbg(&hsphy->phy->dev, "Suspend QCOM SNPS PHY\n");
> >
> > @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int qcom_snps_hsphy_suspend(struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int qcom_snps_hsphy_resume(struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy)
> > +static int qcom_snps_hsphy_do_resume(struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy)
> > {
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -214,25 +214,25 @@ static int qcom_snps_hsphy_resume(struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int __maybe_unused qcom_snps_hsphy_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +static int __maybe_unused qcom_snps_hsphy_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > if (!hsphy->phy_initialized)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - qcom_snps_hsphy_suspend(hsphy);
> > + qcom_snps_hsphy_do_suspend(hsphy);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int __maybe_unused qcom_snps_hsphy_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +static int __maybe_unused qcom_snps_hsphy_resume(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > if (!hsphy->phy_initialized)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - qcom_snps_hsphy_resume(hsphy);
> > + qcom_snps_hsphy_do_resume(hsphy);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -518,8 +518,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_snps_hsphy_of_match_table[] = {
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_snps_hsphy_of_match_table);
> >
> > static const struct dev_pm_ops qcom_snps_hsphy_pm_ops = {
> > - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(qcom_snps_hsphy_runtime_suspend,
> > - qcom_snps_hsphy_runtime_resume, NULL)
> > + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(qcom_snps_hsphy_suspend,
> > + qcom_snps_hsphy_resume, NULL)
> > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(qcom_snps_hsphy_suspend,
> > + qcom_snps_hsphy_resume)
>
> Won't this cause issues if you system suspend the device while it's
> already runtime suspended?
>
I'm not sure if it would cause issues, but after reflexion and discussion
with Andrew, I think it's unnecessary to add system PM ops in the femto
PHY driver.
In the dwc3 core, both system and runtime suspend end up calling
dwc3_suspend_common(). From there, what happens depends on the USB mode
and whether the controller is entering system or runtime suspend.
HOST mode:
(1) system suspend on a non-wakeup controller
The [1] if branch is taken. dwc3_core_exit() is called, which ends up
calling phy_power_off() and phy_exit(). Those two functions decrease the
PM runtime count at some point, so they will trigger the PHY runtime sleep
(assuming the count is right).
(2) runtime suspend / system suspend on a wakeup controller
The [1] branch is not taken. dwc3_suspend_common() calls
phy_pm_runtime_put_sync(dwc->usb2_generic_phy). Assuming the ref count is
right, the PHY runtime suspend op is called.
DEVICE mode:
dwc3_core_exit() is called on both runtime and system sleep
unless the controller is already runtime suspended.
OTG mode:
(1) system suspend : dwc3_core_exit() is called
(2) runtime suspend : do nothing
With that in mind:
1) Does the PHY need to implement system sleep callbacks?
dwc3 core system sleep callback will already runtime suspend the PHY, and
also call phy_power_off() and phy_exit() for non-wakeup controllers. So,
adding system PM ops to the femto PHY driver would be redundant.
2) Should the ref_clk be disabled for runtime sleep / wakeup controller
system sleep, or only for non-wakeup controller system sleep?
I'm a little hesitant here. In my submission I'm disabling it in both, but
looking at the downstream code you provided, it seems it's only disabled
for system sleep. ref_clk is disabled by phy->set_suspend() [2] which IIUC
is only called in the system sleep path through dwc3_core_exit() [3].
Moreover, in host mode the upstream code seems to make a distinction
between 1) runtime sleep / system sleep for wakeup controller, and 2)
system sleep for non-wakeup controller where phy_power_off() and
phy_exit() are only called in the latter. This suggests the PHY is not
supposed to be in a fully powered-off state for runtime sleep and system
sleep for wakeup controller. So, it's possible the ref_clk should be kept
enabled in this case. What is your take on this? I could only disable
ref_clk in the femto phy->exit() callback to keep ref_clk enabled during
runtime sleep and make sure it's only disabled on system sleep for
non-wakeup controller.
Hoping I'm not missing anything here.
Best,
Adrien
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c#L1988
[2] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-5.4/-/blob/LV.AU.1.2.1.r2-05300-gen3meta.0/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-snps-hs.c#L524
[3] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-5.4/-/blob/LV.AU.1.2.1.r2-05300-gen3meta.0/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c#L1915
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > };
> >
> > static void qcom_snps_hsphy_override_param_update_val(
> > --
> > 2.40.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-27 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 19:40 [PATCH v3 0/3] Fixes for qcom-snps-femto-v2 PHY driver Adrien Thierry
2023-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] phy: qcom-snps-femto-v2: properly enable ref clock Adrien Thierry
2023-06-22 21:34 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] phy: qcom-snps-femto-v2: add system sleep PM ops Adrien Thierry
2023-06-22 21:43 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-06-27 18:08 ` Adrien Thierry [this message]
2023-06-27 23:06 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-06-27 18:12 ` Adrien Thierry
2023-06-27 22:56 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: qcom-snps-femto-v2: use qcom_snps_hsphy_do_suspend/resume error code Adrien Thierry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZJslqaHZqdizSGbc@fedora \
--to=athierry@redhat.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox