From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20952C0015E for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232223AbjGKNqQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:46:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59628 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231359AbjGKNqO (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:46:14 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612B71720; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 06:45:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1689083143; x=1720619143; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9H4lxY6vAKcrrWzIJhW2JQY4hyPVgKM+IPDOVEDyRyc=; b=ee4BMRtq6BJ72IA1ENNSRnid0uOHuASD/FUb7DmwaopQVJmGjRDd/Fqu FfrZAmp4haUZjCn8Jw+1OResaQwZL3yTVg8wz1wElELYgacz9CohVKhxK SqZbFlwGceX3bCNxHwvbM8U2JgBi/LU7331auWofbpEj//Y94yZNN2ChN EIgmR4b2Mq/3jrjXqh/ZijBXdVIpLdZdO0j+GOxTrnBstcaDqkcamp+2b UeJXnlpuigHgY0cWo1RjoHBcA64LXlF+Ixd/oy9tYmP7AyL0ON7c4Kw6j k3su8LMvxykbKWS18DVDnfsNS9C5M0iwwYpkKkRH3O0IHZRNHHZtGmcp5 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10768"; a="354484232" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,196,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="354484232" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jul 2023 06:45:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10768"; a="750766718" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,196,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="750766718" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2023 06:45:29 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qJDgE-001rb5-12; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 16:45:26 +0300 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 16:45:25 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown Cc: Cristian Ciocaltea , Yang Yingliang , Amit Kumar Mahapatra via Alsa-devel , Neil Armstrong , Tharun Kumar P , Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Sanjay R Mehta , Radu Pirea , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , Tudor Ambarus , Serge Semin , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Kevin Hilman , Jerome Brunet , Martin Blumenstingl , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Heiko Stuebner , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Orson Zhai , Baolin Wang , Chunyan Zhang , Alain Volmat , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Max Filippov , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] spi: Header and core clean up and refactoring Message-ID: References: <20230710154932.68377-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <58c6f76a-8028-4ce8-a101-d5feb3b40897@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:38:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:11:59PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Do you think patch 9 deserves to be proceeded? > > That one I need to think about, may as well resend it and I can think > about the resend. Got it. Probably I have to amend commit message in the patch 9 to point out why struct_size() is better. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko