From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4365217985 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="GCGpj/vy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705333648; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KnzswkQ+DuK9NjL9QK0UKKPu2vm7bCrl7oml7Skr2oY=; b=GCGpj/vy1MLO3RP2wvS/EIYZm5YIn4/2QWs1Dhd90DtAdtMYfJNXXbA3yTGWmxNQDM42kc nAJvFOCY4iy8Z1vtTUSHABqvREKs68TBzfWKxnjokbbmlNKhOf0JgaPrixdZ1D4lTH6gPD tbxL9zg9fTfwTgMB8I289hpB9mAKUv4= Received: from mail-qt1-f197.google.com (mail-qt1-f197.google.com [209.85.160.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-341-LGoaGbQ_OZqmmFYqjHwHow-1; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:05 -0500 X-MC-Unique: LGoaGbQ_OZqmmFYqjHwHow-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f197.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-429899f12c8so118124631cf.3 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 07:47:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705333625; x=1705938425; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KnzswkQ+DuK9NjL9QK0UKKPu2vm7bCrl7oml7Skr2oY=; b=AVRTZLLeUo7hjCuE0cD2K9l6a3RNOtyF+/c349IeD3biswbHG90F/HQePquTvQNK9/ zQ/T3Bc4Uj5w2G4LpDs3EtKAUVUB78cwk4GR8tACymA7qA2jFFMDFwH7crenc17tan++ ZLSoC61tH70tYnjZh9aGW0k8P+QqL4xqpMqBLRqxQlRz+r2K0Qhrj7Shm1AP0PgqNMba hcelLju8QwukQN+0WDkrwJItjlMPp/0WPZoic2/CxdfrVBQTxnA/gT9/hSjsDYXAxmFT WuLDOSjuium7k3UxpqyU/TtX+pFz5DkCt40tMRHlnqOtey2J0dqC4SXR530Y6hUmqPSI zWYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxQrLxGw+2oV5FdB6duCV3mzGItDHGEOmEgou1tRX8ertXaG1c3 OTQIpxt90t6csYePxpXoOUKB1Be7PkcbCNebeAocRvq3G2jbuRItnUkDWDqMTCpw4JZCar5hmYu 2JVcLYxjj+IOLxqcKuy5jrhb+GATdH9cMXA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:3c8:b0:429:d043:6a11 with SMTP id k8-20020a05622a03c800b00429d0436a11mr7947982qtx.33.1705333624861; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 07:47:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEFp3tM+8GK9TNJa7xv7RBILG/5a0z3VZf3ahdtAakngZuECE5dAGmy/UIce3ie1YgIY6zPzA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:3c8:b0:429:d043:6a11 with SMTP id k8-20020a05622a03c800b00429d0436a11mr7947948qtx.33.1705333623644; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 07:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from x1 (c-24-2-114-156.hsd1.pa.comcast.net. [24.2.114.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f12-20020a05622a114c00b00427f1eeddccsm4004027qty.38.2024.01.15.07.47.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 07:47:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:02 -0500 From: Brian Masney To: Elliot Berman Cc: Shazad Hussain , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Eric Chanudet , Prasad Sodagudi , Neil Armstrong Subject: Re: sa8755p ufs ice bug: gcc_ufs_phy_ice_core_clk status stuck at 'off' Message-ID: References: <49d85352-d022-4b59-a3f2-d8f7ef3028ac@quicinc.com> <37ff80b1-62fa-45ce-b181-955cc887d47d@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37ff80b1-62fa-45ce-b181-955cc887d47d@quicinc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.10 (2023-03-25) On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:56:30PM -0800, Elliot Berman wrote: > Things have been a bit more reliable for me after adding the power-domains. > > Are you getting stuck at the same spot or somewhere else? > > I've been looking at a similar issue to [1], so I wonder if maybe you're > facing that instead. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240104101735.48694-1-laura.nao@collabora.com/T/#m39f7c80b59c750ee4c0082474c5c15b6055927ef I had some time Friday to setup some automation to bisect this. Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the hang on a sa8775p with the upstream ARM64 defconfig on linux-next-20240112. I can reproduce it using Fedora's arm64 defconfig with the same version of linux-next. We have a lab move going on this week and our sa8775p boards will be unavailable. I'll start a bisect with the Fedora config once our boards are available again. Brian