From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Johan Hovold" <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: qcom: Read back PARF_LTSSM register
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:47:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfR7uCcflCiFTvBh@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1f85249-32b1-41e2-adc3-5aa4ad7609b9@linaro.org>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 2/16/24 07:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > This makes no sense. As Bjorn already said, you're just polling for the
> > link to come up (for a second). And unless you have something else that
> > depends on the write to have reached the device, there is no need to
> > read it back. It's not going to be cached indefinitely if that's what
> > you fear.
>
> The point is, if we know that the hardware is expected to return "done"
> within the polling timeout value of receiving the request to do so, we
> are actively taking away an unknown amount of time from that timeout.
We're talking about microseconds, not milliseconds or seconds as you
seem to believe.
> So, if the polling condition becomes true after 980ms, but due to write
> buffering the value reached the PCIe hardware after 21 ms, we're gonna
> hit a timeout. Or under truly extreme circumstances, the polling may
> time out before the write has even arrived at the PCIe hw.
So the write latency is not an issue here.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-15 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-10 17:10 [PATCH v2 0/3] Qualcomm PCIe RC shutdown & reinit Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-10 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: qcom: reshuffle reset logic in 2_7_0 .init Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-12 21:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-15 11:51 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-10 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: qcom: Read back PARF_LTSSM register Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-12 21:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-14 21:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-14 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-15 10:21 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-15 16:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-15 18:44 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-16 6:52 ` Johan Hovold
2024-03-15 10:16 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-03-15 11:16 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-15 16:47 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2024-03-27 19:37 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-03-27 19:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-10 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: qcom: properly implement RC shutdown/power up Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-12 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-14 21:33 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-15 7:13 ` Johan Hovold
2024-02-15 10:22 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-20 4:12 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-03-27 19:37 ` Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfR7uCcflCiFTvBh@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).