From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63696D29E; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710866601; cv=none; b=TEo6xCwpEotoaBObJDhftdgFvAR2g/HRjlamYbSNo4NpKkRwwakrNk/X5CB3gccckcUK9w7g6KzAbvCHt1HLfQZsJOwH7i13Xxy2veR3z1VG2XEoxXba+W7PaGA4AKBj740YmcB+u0uUxt3s0tVP/OzQ22yXpMfAQ0wJQzoeSP4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710866601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7q6K03v9Gajaxg7y54ygTX+ANkBwLzliWh+n0D7C7nY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TptCiJTEN+n2XpOENpZYlWmUC996ex1AdI0aTenT1xZuPTssMFQFsa3eEr0567+ZM8mMPfCnfQw5FhRvrbzeQJJGyS2F29Ds2KELha1eIIpUEF1Uf13JXvQ70qYvG8BbJMHffY52YKTDm1fJi6NRURPJYxPS7hoAAuz+IGl//o8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YI04zE8L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YI04zE8L" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E02A7C433C7; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:43:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710866600; bh=7q6K03v9Gajaxg7y54ygTX+ANkBwLzliWh+n0D7C7nY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YI04zE8LVliNzxYztt5R88IbNw4YFt2AxA+0Swc/ydZsmpym7x7i09cyRN2qVc0Kt 6qLHX5IBr9bMgLB+/uBWsA+DjENIzFxy95IDdLKASyTihj70Wc931pSW+GAHyCgBov TBECJWTpaBnW1LoNZ3euYwTAf/xkRpMo7fJBJZYhTV4mzvLBqQZd/gE5CNJaAZKD+V K7NmBBheWFRtdlXFWWlN3XRZ1ZGynqoUgtoQOYD1BqbuFXNLDaTZv9tsZKrCl+Ajoe PQsoMv+VZxYBs/ZDBseBhN0316CX7YMVNFN/RMf78vZprsXc73eNQqoqHJ+DuOFzvP 1JYSA1iocAO4Q== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1rmcYi-000000000vo-0EDB; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:43:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:43:28 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Konrad Dybcio Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] Clean up thermal zone polling-delay Message-ID: References: <20240319-topic-msm-polling-cleanup-v1-0-e0aee1dbcd78@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240319-topic-msm-polling-cleanup-v1-0-e0aee1dbcd78@linaro.org> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 05:13:30PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > A trivial follow-up on the changes introduced in Commit 488164006a28 > ("thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent"). > > Should probably wait until v6.9-rc1 so that the patch in question is > in the base tree, otherwise TZs will fail to register. > > FWIW, Compile-tested only (except 8280). Please provide some more details on how you verified these patches (or that patch). Last time you said you just checked that the interrupt counters were incremented, which is not sufficient. Johan