From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CFD913D886; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 11:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731150301; cv=none; b=m5zcBEfIvaBFSQc2YmCr8T29r/5YT0zdO5xa+286iCOpItPulUWbj8C01YUfAMMml7xa+FJ1KTl9PcwVcsNs10TLwhJ8pO1zsON3bq+UaOrsAZ7opLsSboogctHMW3ZIXSdoCHs9yIqv1YQHN/y1AMIa2UPE8MhuCdem9KtXwCg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731150301; c=relaxed/simple; bh=euqJK0ntVjQw+QOGivI7fOl8DgX26ZTRRMEWEMAcpIw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SgNoXT1NrarfilqHYp10XI7M9+9gbcx3mnmn7A1684mMtWFf8RjyzhOOQlJuxlPd4sa+6Gi1VtqCCeVdBsGOy6SFS/9kgwM2iI5UxphZNTLVDvFzau0bo3xQ9uH6Ii0uxIpigbA64FtcUz03QT9j/V9InNwGFteQq3fCUAvyl3M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=h1Qayx0t; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="h1Qayx0t" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E826C4CECE; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 11:05:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1731150300; bh=euqJK0ntVjQw+QOGivI7fOl8DgX26ZTRRMEWEMAcpIw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=h1Qayx0tdzHz3ogJQWZ7gcb117WFpIxOt92gsgRdNiHUDLqlF9kC6OvZAKris6b4B S2QCoDB6S/xtxpdH/yGV3Rhl/8FTdAAxjD+4ccDxbb1IkHgJlHrPYKf+nq1Vgnyvto mciowh+BpR9k0CIbcemuKV7Wc7/lGJQC0+tD8GRE2ENH9NoIDLUmJ7oh1riWjw9Mvl Nt8wwVfeS9o0m+RV7P9pNyRy6oKCQFiwpZ7LghKycDEcyem8IAdR2TWmE2Nv8htPSe Zo8QrDDcoPlT82RjCa69oVHB9iZ9xbS+8EYUCe/wMBLj8D1t6G2fpKHErt1HJUoAXB Ix3HLRQgokqHw== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1t9jH5-000000001KK-1JVj; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 12:05:03 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:05:03 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Abel Vesa , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Sibi Sankar , Rajendra Nayak , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , stable+noautosel@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Fix missing address/size cells warnings Message-ID: References: <20241109-x1e80100-fix-address-size-cells-missing-warnings-v1-0-c1e173369657@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 at 00:05, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > > The commit 4b28a0dec185 ("of: WARN on deprecated #address-cells/#size-cells > > handling") now forces all parent nodes to describe the #adress-cells > > and #size-cells, otherwise it will throw a warning. > > > > Note that this patch is currently only in -next. > > > > Fix all warnings on the X Elite by adding these two properties to all > > parent nodes that don't have them. > > The individual patches are incorrect per my understanding. None of > those child nodes use addressing, so adding #address-cells = <1> is > incorrect. Maybe it should be #address-cells = <0>, but that looks a > bit ridiculous to me. Yeah, the warnings are bogus. Rob merged a fix last night: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241108193547.2647986-2-robh@kernel.org/ so this should be resolved in linux-next on Monday or so. Johan