From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
quic_rgottimu@quicinc.com, quic_kshivnan@quicinc.com,
conor+dt@kernel.org, quic_nkela@quicinc.com,
quic_psodagud@quicinc.com, abel.vesa@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/2] qcom: x1e80100: Enable CPUFreq
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:19:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyTjiiGc2ApoID9Y@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86plnf11yf.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 02:08:24PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I'm seeing similar things indeed. Randomly grepping in cpufreq/policy*
> results in hard resets, although I don't get much on the serial
> console when that happens. Interestingly, I also see some errors in
> dmesg at boot time:
>
> maz@semi-fraudulent:~$ dmesg| grep -i scmi
> [ 0.966175] scmi_core: SCMI protocol bus registered
> [ 7.929710] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: Using scmi_mailbox_transport
> [ 7.939059] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: SCMI max-rx-timeout: 30ms
> [ 7.945567] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: SCMI RAW Mode initialized for instance 0
> [ 7.958348] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: SCMI RAW Mode COEX enabled !
> [ 7.978303] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: SCMI Notifications - Core Enabled.
> [ 7.985351] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: SCMI Protocol v2.0 'Qualcomm:' Firmware version 0x20000
> [ 8.033774] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: Failed to add opps_by_lvl at 3801600 for NCC - ret:-16
> [ 8.033902] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: Failed to add opps_by_lvl at 3801600 for NCC - ret:-16
> [ 8.036528] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: Failed to add opps_by_lvl at 3801600 for NCC - ret:-16
> [ 8.036744] arm-scmi arm-scmi.2.auto: Failed to add opps_by_lvl at 3801600 for NCC - ret:-16
> [ 8.171232] scmi-perf-domain scmi_dev.4: Initialized 3 performance domains
>
> All these "Failed" are a bit worrying. Happy to put any theory to the
> test.
Yes, those warnings indeed look troubling. Fortunately they appear to be
mostly benign and only indicate that the firmware is reporting duplicate
OPPs, which the kernel is now ignoring without any other side effects
than the warnings.
The side-effects and these remaining warnings are addressed by this
series:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241030125512.2884761-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
but I think we should try to make the warnings a bit more informative
(and less scary) by printing something along the lines of:
arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: [Firmware Bug]: Ignoring duplicate OPP 3417600 for NCC
instead.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 13:08 [PATCH V7 0/2] qcom: x1e80100: Enable CPUFreq Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 13:08 ` [PATCH V7 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add cpucp mailbox and sram nodes Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 13:08 ` [PATCH V7 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Enable cpufreq Sibi Sankar
2024-11-01 13:00 ` [PATCH V7 0/2] qcom: x1e80100: Enable CPUFreq Johan Hovold
2024-11-01 14:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-01 14:19 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2024-11-01 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-05 16:57 ` Johan Hovold
2024-11-05 18:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-05 11:23 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-12-05 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-05 15:46 ` Johan Hovold
2025-01-06 12:22 ` Sibi Sankar
2025-01-06 14:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-01-10 9:52 ` Johan Hovold
2025-01-17 6:36 ` Sibi Sankar
2025-05-08 12:20 ` Johan Hovold
2025-05-17 5:57 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyTjiiGc2ApoID9Y@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_kshivnan@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_psodagud@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_rgottimu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox