From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add entries for passing load values Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:43:00 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1539004739-32060-1-git-send-email-vbadigan@codeaurora.org> <1539004739-32060-3-git-send-email-vbadigan@codeaurora.org> <20181012145516.GA10205@bogus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181012145516.GA10205@bogus> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, evgreen@chromium.org, dianders@google.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org, riteshh@codeaurora.org, stummala@codeaurora.org, sayalil@codeaurora.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Vijay Viswanath , Mark Rutland , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , open list List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 10/12/2018 8:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:48:58PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti wrote: >> From: Vijay Viswanath >> >> The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator >> is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for >> the required load. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath >> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt >> index 502b3b8..cb22178 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt >> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ Required properties: >> "xo" - TCXO clock (optional) >> "cal" - reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) >> "sleep" - sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) >> +- qcom,-current-level-microamp - specifies load levels for supply during BUS_ON and >> + BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be specified in >> + pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and BUS_ON respectively. >> + Units uA. > Seems like something that should be common? Hi Rob, Can you please little elaborate your comment? Do mean this should be common for all vendors, not specific to qcom-mmc? Thanks, Veera