From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, arnd@arndb.de, timur@codeaurora.org,
sulrich@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] MIPS: io: add a barrier after register read in readX()
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:20:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a50e4919-24d8-de37-c696-ec964988ca8b@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180412215149.GA27802@saruman>
On 4/12/2018 5:51 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> But why don't we always use wmb() in the writeX() case? Might not the
> cached write to DMA buffer be reordered with the uncached write to MMIO
> register from the coherent DMA point of view? I'm waiting on feedback
> from MIPS hardware folk on this topic.
Are you asking about this?
#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGSON3_ENHANCEMENT)
#define war_io_reorder_wmb() wmb()
#else
-#define war_io_reorder_wmb() do { } while (0)
+#define war_io_reorder_wmb() barrier()
#endif
There is a write barrier in writeX() but seem to be different from platform
to platform.
I'm not familiar with the MIPS architecture. We can always use a wmb() but it
could hurt performance where it is not needed.
This is the kind of input we need from the MIPS folks if compiler barrier is
enough or we need a wmb() for all cases.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-12 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 12:55 [PATCH v3 1/2] MIPS: io: prevent compiler reordering on the default writeX() implementation Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] MIPS: io: add a barrier after register read in readX() Sinan Kaya
2018-04-06 1:34 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-06 18:15 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-06 21:26 ` James Hogan
2018-04-07 21:43 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-11 17:10 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-11 20:26 ` James Hogan
2018-04-11 20:48 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-11 17:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-04-12 21:51 ` James Hogan
2018-04-12 21:58 ` James Hogan
2018-04-12 22:38 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-12 22:20 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2018-04-13 15:41 ` David Laight
2018-04-13 16:36 ` Sinan Kaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a50e4919-24d8-de37-c696-ec964988ca8b@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sulrich@codeaurora.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).