From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom: qmp-pcie: drop bogus x1e80100 qref supply
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:47:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBCSMaZ7_tl-dEkB@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f44722a5-25b5-409c-baec-13d19af61d43@quicinc.com>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 04:24:19PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
>
> On 4/29/2025 3:54 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > The PCIe PHYs on x1e80100 do not a have a qref supply so stop requesting
> > one. This also avoids the follow warning at boot:
> >
> > qcom-qmp-pcie-phy 1be0000.phy: supply vdda-qref not found, using dummy regulator
> >
> > Fixes: e961ec81a39b ("phy: qcom: qmp: Add phy register and clk setting for x1e80100 PCIe3")
> > Cc: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> > ---
> We have QREF for each PCIe port on the X1E80100, all of which consume
> the regulator L3J. Although the PCIe PHY uses QREF indirectly, this
> creates a dependency, right?
The PHY binding should describe the direct dependencies for the PHY, so
the addition of qref for sm8550/sm8650 was probably also a mistake.
From what I could tell there is not even a one-to-one mapping of qref
supplies to PCIe ports, but perhaps you can provide more details on how
this fits together here?
> If PCIe doesn't vote for it, how can the
> PMIC driver decide when to disable L3J during system suspend or runtime
> suspend? Is there a chance that L3J could be disabled while PCIe still
> requires it?
If the QREF supplies can be turned off, you may need to mark them as
always-on until things are described properly. But whether that's needed
is not even clear at this point:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17a1a4d9-fdc5-477a-bf4e-91cae5a62479@oss.qualcomm.com/
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 7:54 [PATCH] phy: qcom: qmp-pcie: drop bogus x1e80100 qref supply Johan Hovold
2025-04-29 8:01 ` Abel Vesa
2025-04-29 8:24 ` Qiang Yu
2025-04-29 8:47 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-05-14 11:37 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBCSMaZ7_tl-dEkB@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_qianyu@quicinc.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox