From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] efi: efivars: don't crash in efivar_set_variable{,_locked} in r/o case
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 14:51:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF1CX2uWZ_KaMDVR@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <zw5u5c2itmpxq34d22y5wmtr32d4zsmjj5clf77ryeqs5jgd4v@t3wjfyj43yra>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 02:03:44PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 12:04:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 01:53:20AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > If efivar implementation doesn't provide write support, then calling
> > > efivar_set_variable() (e.g. when PM8xxx RTC driver tries to update the
> > > RTC offset) will crash the system. Prevent that by checking that
> > > set_variable callback is actually provided and fail with an
> > > EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED if it is not.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 472831d4c4b2 ("efi: vars: Add thin wrapper around EFI get/set variable interface")
> >
> > I don't think a fixes tag is warranted here as it currently appears to
> > be expected that the callers check if setvar is supported before calling
> > this helper (e.g. by calling efivar_supports_writes() as efivarfs does).
>
> It is not documented as such. So, I think, we'd better not crash the
> callers.
You need to look at the backstory to determine that before jumping to
conclusions (e.g. start by looking at f88814cc2578 ("efi/efivars: Expose
RT service availability via efivars abstraction")).
> > So should perhaps be fixed in the RTC driver if we agree that supporting
> > read-only offsets is indeed something we want.
> >
> > Are there any other current user that may possibly benefit from
> > something like this?
>
> efi-pstore comes to my mind.
No, that driver is also disabled when efivar_supports_writes() returns
false.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 22:53 [PATCH v4 0/8] firmware: qcom: enable UEFI variables on Lenovo Yoga C630 Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] efi: efivars: don't crash in efivar_set_variable{,_locked} in r/o case Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 10:04 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-26 11:03 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 12:51 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-06-26 12:54 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-27 12:27 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-28 15:05 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-30 12:15 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] firmware: qcom: scm: allow specifying quirks for QSEECOM implementations Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] firmware: qcom: uefisecapp: add support for R/O UEFI vars Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-07-16 19:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-07-16 21:07 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] firmware: qcom: enable QSEECOM on Lenovo Yoga C630 Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] firmware; qcom: scm: enable QSEECOM on SC8280XP CRD Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 23:34 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-26 23:48 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 23:54 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-27 12:23 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-27 12:26 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-27 12:50 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-28 14:50 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-30 12:16 ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-16 19:02 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-06-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] firmware: qcom: scm: add modparam to control QSEECOM enablement Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 10:11 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-26 11:08 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 12:58 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-26 23:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-27 12:46 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-28 15:03 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-30 12:42 ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-01 11:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-07-10 9:40 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] firmware: qcom: scm: rework QSEECOM allowlist Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 9:56 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-26 11:09 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 13:02 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630: fix RTC offset info Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-26 10:16 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-26 11:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF1CX2uWZ_KaMDVR@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=steev@kali.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).