linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Krishna Chaitanya Chundru" <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: qcom: Switch to bus notifier for enabling ASPM of PCI devices
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 09:48:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHYHzrl0DE2HV86S@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714-aspm_fix-v1-1-7d04b8c140c8@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:31:04PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Commit 9f4f3dfad8cf ("PCI: qcom: Enable ASPM for platforms supporting 1.9.0
> ops") allowed the Qcom controller driver to enable ASPM for all PCI devices
> enumerated at the time of the controller driver probe. It proved to be
> useful for devices already powered on by the bootloader as it allowed
> devices to enter ASPM without user intervention.
> 
> However, it could not enable ASPM for the hotplug capable devices i.e.,
> devices enumerated *after* the controller driver probe. This limitation
> mostly went unnoticed as the Qcom PCI controllers are not hotplug capable
> and also the bootloader has been enabling the PCI devices before Linux
> Kernel boots (mostly on the Qcom compute platforms which users use on a
> daily basis).
> 
> But with the advent of the commit b458ff7e8176 ("PCI/pwrctl: Ensure that
> pwrctl drivers are probed before PCI client drivers"), the pwrctrl driver
> started to block the PCI device enumeration until it had been probed.
> Though, the intention of the commit was to avoid race between the pwrctrl
> driver and PCI client driver, it also meant that the pwrctrl controlled PCI
> devices may get probed after the controller driver and will no longer have
> ASPM enabled. So users started noticing high runtime power consumption with
> WLAN chipsets on Qcom compute platforms like Thinkpad X13s, and Thinkpad
> T14s, etc...
> 
> Obviously, it is the pwrctrl change that caused regression, but it
> ultimately uncovered a flaw in the ASPM enablement logic of the controller
> driver. So to address the actual issue, switch to the bus notifier for
> enabling ASPM of the PCI devices. The notifier will notify the controller
> driver when a PCI device is attached to the bus, thereby allowing it to
> enable ASPM more reliably. It should be noted that the
> 'pci_dev::link_state', which is required for enabling ASPM by the
> pci_enable_link_state_locked() API, is only set by the time of
> BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER stage of the notification. So we cannot enable ASPM
> during BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE stage.

A problem with this approach is that ASPM will never be enabled (and
power consumption will be higher) in case an endpoint driver is missing.

I think that's something we should try to avoid.

> So with this, we can also get rid of the controller driver specific
> 'qcom_pcie_ops::host_post_init' callback.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.7
> Fixes: 9f4f3dfad8cf ("PCI: qcom: Enable ASPM for platforms supporting 1.9.0 ops")
> Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>

Note that the patch fails to apply to 6.16-rc6 due to changes in
linux-next. Depending on how fast we can come up with a fix it may be
better to target 6.16.

> -static int qcom_pcie_enable_aspm(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *userdata)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * Downstream devices need to be in D0 state before enabling PCI PM
> -	 * substates.
> -	 */
> -	pci_set_power_state_locked(pdev, PCI_D0);
> -	pci_enable_link_state_locked(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_ALL);
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}

I think you should consider leaving this helper in place here to keep
the size of the diff down (e.g. as you intend to backport this).

> +static int qcom_pcie_enable_aspm(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Downstream devices need to be in D0 state before enabling PCI PM
> +	 * substates.
> +	 */
> +	pci_set_power_state_locked(pdev, PCI_D0);
> +	pci_enable_link_state_locked(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_ALL);

You need to use the non-locked helpers here since you no longer hold the
bus semaphore (e.g. as reported by lockdep).

Maybe this makes the previous comment about not moving the helper moot.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pcie_qcom_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> +			      void *data)
> +{
> +	struct qcom_pcie *pcie = container_of(nb, struct qcom_pcie, nb);

This results in an unused variable warning (presumably until the next
patch in the series is applied).

> +	struct device *dev = data;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +	switch (action) {
> +	case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
> +		qcom_pcie_enable_aspm(pdev);
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}

Missing newline.

>  static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	const struct qcom_pcie_cfg *pcie_cfg;

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-15  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-14 18:01 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: qcom: Switch to bus notifier for enabling ASPM of PCI devices Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-14 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-15  7:48   ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-07-15  9:11     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-15  9:33       ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-15  9:46         ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-07-15 10:27         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-15 12:31           ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-21  9:32   ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-21 10:56     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-21 12:49       ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-21 15:45         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-14 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: qcom: Move qcom_pcie_icc_opp_update() to notifier callback Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-15  7:51   ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-15  9:13     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-15  9:54   ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-07-15 10:36     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-15 10:45       ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-07-16  5:28         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-16 10:33           ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-07-21  9:15             ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-16  4:54       ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-07-16  6:46         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-16  6:53           ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-07-16  7:18             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-07-21  9:02           ` Johan Hovold
2025-07-21 10:59             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aHYHzrl0DE2HV86S@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).