From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177E73B8D68; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 05:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765172765; cv=none; b=e0NHPQ5VRgEthTKL01fWDTmCTi16lKFJjcCZRpVCP/BhCSWBXj90DcTdGPWjO3xyL3tiyG+wXiaaylogLV6LOMykxs0tNdNsb4qeYNiBqyqV04/gAfm/KVNUMxVzm7lb5rKRoChQvU8TLd5R/Vbt4YTxohXXd7KeKjlD1tDh2j8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765172765; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4oPFnaKOuwa795QouzAkLdFmxipO+zRI6ijexJF2Dxw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=m/GitTG7m9BC1iEcjAcuh2EAP2oI2t6aXgBFzscFIfbiA1ss3knQu9wkjO5sIAfoZLBtGFx8p/ZJ4HQ2NGAaObm8eMH0hL5hQ9Vn5UwvrG0kTKNnTqN78Il4hg/t5xO1PZL6icqMtMLe7Lb6Z//n9xfX5slF7kjoC653IwPh0xM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lCUkO5wH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lCUkO5wH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C384C4CEF1; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 05:46:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765172764; bh=4oPFnaKOuwa795QouzAkLdFmxipO+zRI6ijexJF2Dxw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lCUkO5wHsKZaS1oV3YA4xJ+CuE3qQlV6O/izT24g2LwTzWQM0yWZDfrfXf8XszMZM pU7zjfUPgjvYmGK5EGD/fuhch+Ncj7uAQH/atF4qnUZpN/Zgfb5MtnJAPYXmYWlGdR ecR1dkvQK7j0zb22jeMacLyxp0uqmxqs8jS333sRUmep9+h4otHPN2oyZdOtsai0+P 6fOmtKSOJ6BRwDZxmrNJb6jFgjopig9uDBC7tMPvRkQA7r4poQaIWDEur1i4fx9W84 hsb5RlkxjqfzLp/7IylsogbO5hf7pae/x2S4Zlba4P+0aiJ+uDNLuNM3jR6xIJKzbM L3Rhlaf8d62oQ== Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 06:45:59 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Jingoo Han , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Heiko Stuebner Cc: FUKAUMI Naoki , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Make Link Up IRQ logic handle already powered on PCIe switches Message-ID: References: <20251201063634.4115762-2-cassel@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251201063634.4115762-2-cassel@kernel.org> On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 07:36:35AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote: Mani, could you perhaps try this series on Qcom? I personally prefer this series over a revert because: It allows to us to still use a PCIe endpoint that comes up after the main system has booted, e.g. when the PCIe endpoint is a board running pci-epf-test, without the need for a manual rescan on be bus. If we go with revert instead, this very nice feature would be gone, and the user would need to do a manual rescan of the bus. One could even argue that that is a user visible regression. Kind regards, Niklas