From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7461A254E for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765904002; cv=none; b=ILlm5vJ5P3KOS4Dux3Pa3GEkIzjgT0i/q45fs2sTM5orpMa/9tKx3ZpQlyefsLW+DdmKxhTe2/SlnjKyRll+nz9Kq9FIml5B0B3uBlNKC3+5K+djFDFI6EoaSumcHnECabSEdtJldL32nJM2bTHuP4a1nq4bh2i/ZXknsIBtBIE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765904002; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hB3tjWs2Z2dfiaOVswwyTb3KNiZkv7M5DzbEiPD8jLQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l8BCEEp24f6zUzTbFj889pdwCPM8HJCcadamheEV8hD1bDpFEih3oTV8Q+DotOhDl60KtyHNnpQ9u5rs2X1eRuAYBFZdJi/xhfHeXgnH2RlcwHjsQzhcl7cSupOr24RKJkw/+Od2J5lliDniw79bZLUG/gCpq3y4E2w2Y3WUPDE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pxonYLcQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pxonYLcQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80C33C4CEF1; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:53:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765904002; bh=hB3tjWs2Z2dfiaOVswwyTb3KNiZkv7M5DzbEiPD8jLQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pxonYLcQly7R2o9RURtXVVJNxLDCvcatHnKFucPtmVluBQJEuPacvwBVnSIPNQ5y8 fVMQz7Bg2hyTTQrLKjvfi1tR7eX+/rQON2uzzWuLv677iywbnnurBPbkGLQ+x9kimK FCcPFzJLnAgnEhXZbWxsiIqmq7JvnDyBWAmSn8G5AybfMI6iNzv5WnIHulGur+AH5r DlRMKtWLmkwoGx6OoDzVlKuR/Ozq7ObBXFioUzMMAOYGfpA1Ra4kIl5aTyT1MsYzrO 3jndKljRcJBb/Fk7Puh//mMGmsjs+rYKoYUNkbqCTyLZJDKpwpFesFs0H45NqzNr52 qnMAn8vzAemqA== Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 22:23:18 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Sakari Ailus Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ludovic Desroches , Sinan Kaya , Linus Walleij , Michal Simek , Stephan Gerhold , Md Sadre Alam , Konrad Dybcio , Casey Connolly , Abin Joseph , Radhey Shyam Pandey , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dmaengine: qcom: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls Message-ID: References: <20251027133232.392898-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20251027133232.392898-3-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251027133232.392898-3-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> On 27-10-25, 15:32, Sakari Ailus wrote: > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(), > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). This one fails for me. I have picked the rest. Can you please rebase this one -- ~Vinod