From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Cong Zhang <cong.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: skip CPU offline notify on unmapped hctx
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 19:42:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVO6my9tG1djaKpA@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251230-blk_mq_no_ctx_checking-v1-1-2168131383e6@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 05:17:05PM +0800, Cong Zhang wrote:
> If an hctx has no software ctx mapped, blk_mq_map_swqueue() never
> allocates tags and leaves hctx->tags NULL. The CPU hotplug offline
> notifier can still run for that hctx, return early since hctx cannot
> hold any requests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Zhang <cong.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
Fixes: bf0beec0607d ("blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline")
> ---
> This issue was observed during CPU hotplug. If an hctx is not mapped,
> offlining a CPU can trigger a kernel crash.
> When a block device does not map all hctx, some hctx instances may remain
> unused. These unused hctx can still receive CPU offline notifications and
> enter blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline().
> blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline() calls blk_mq_hctx_has_requests() to check
> whether there are pending requests on the hctx. However, unused hctx do
> not have tags allocated, which leads to a crash.
> Since an unused hctx cannot have any requests, fix this by returning
> early when nr_ctx is zero, skipping blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline().
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 1978eef95dca3fb332a73aeff7b9613ee770a8a3..eff4f72ce83be80aac9da86aab35079be7d2b5e4 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3721,7 +3721,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_online);
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (blk_mq_hctx_has_online_cpu(hctx, cpu))
> + if (!hctx->nr_ctx || blk_mq_hctx_has_online_cpu(hctx, cpu))
> return 0;
Looks correct, and the notify_online handler won't touch hctx->tags:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-30 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-30 9:17 [PATCH] blk-mq: skip CPU offline notify on unmapped hctx Cong Zhang
2025-12-30 11:42 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-12-30 16:02 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aVO6my9tG1djaKpA@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cong.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).